06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Law <strong>and</strong> order’ policy<br />

Given that politicians are in the business of staying in or attaining office, it is in<br />

their interests to align their policies with widely held public sentiments. Moreover,<br />

politicians do not merely react to public sentiment; public sentiment is heavily<br />

influenced by political agendas <strong>and</strong> media coverage on crime.<br />

Criminal justice experts<br />

Criminal justice experts are often involved in the policy-making process in some<br />

capacity. They may include: academics, commercial research companies <strong>and</strong> think<br />

tanks. Criminal justice experts will often advocate for policy changes in response to<br />

system deficiencies that have come to their attention as a result of their professional<br />

work. Experts may be consulted in the process of drafting policy documents or be<br />

asked to advise ministers on issues within their field of expertise. They may also<br />

make submissions to parliamentary inquiries. At times, governments will utilise<br />

expert opinion to legitimise their policy decisions.<br />

Private-sector firms<br />

Governments contract out some of their responsibilities to the private sector. For<br />

example, although the punishment of offenders is a state responsibility, the<br />

government has contracted private-sector firms to operate prisons in Australia.<br />

Private-sector firms who provide criminal justice services have a vested interest in<br />

any policy developments that may impact how they operate in this area.<br />

How ‘law <strong>and</strong> order’ policy is made<br />

Various approaches, theories <strong>and</strong> models have been developed to explain <strong>and</strong><br />

analyse the law <strong>and</strong> order policy-making process. The different actors <strong>and</strong> the<br />

extent of their respective contributions <strong>and</strong> influence on law <strong>and</strong> order policy are<br />

contingent on the policy-making model adopted. A small number of models, <strong>and</strong><br />

‘policy transfer’ in law <strong>and</strong> order, will be considered here.<br />

Models of law <strong>and</strong> order policy making<br />

Table 2 provides an overview of the core models of law <strong>and</strong> order policy making,<br />

drawn from Hobbs <strong>and</strong> Hamerton. 29 The law <strong>and</strong> order policy-making process<br />

does not strictly follow any of these models; rather, it combines different elements<br />

from each model. For less contentious law <strong>and</strong> order issues, policy makers generally<br />

employ more elements of the rational decision model, which focuses on evidencebased<br />

policy making. Issues that elicit greater political contestation or are hasty<br />

29 Hobbs <strong>and</strong> Hamerton 2014.<br />

659

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!