06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

important that local governments work to ensure responsibility for climate change<br />

adaptation is shared between the public <strong>and</strong> private sectors, <strong>and</strong> communities. 59<br />

Reluctance to change service-delivery models<br />

Local governments design services to meet local needs. However, sometimes there<br />

can be a reluctance to change service-delivery models. The dominance of different<br />

functions performed by local governments across Australia’s states <strong>and</strong> territories<br />

also influences their capacity to alter service delivery models. For instance, social<br />

services are often amenable to delivery by non-government providers, while major<br />

infrastructure is increasingly provided through public–private partnership (PPP)<br />

models. The way services have been delivered in the past is a strong predictor of<br />

how they will be delivered in the future. There is often considerable reluctance to<br />

change how things are done due to ‘the uncertainty <strong>and</strong> management structure<br />

costs incurred with a switch of models’. 60<br />

Lamothe, Lamothe <strong>and</strong> Feiock suggest that ‘in complex <strong>and</strong> uncertain situations<br />

organizational inertia <strong>and</strong> incrementalism may limit local public officials’ ability to<br />

depart radically from past arrangements’. 61 This could lead risk-averse managers to<br />

prefer the maintenance of existing service-delivery models over potentially superior,<br />

but uncertain, alternatives.<br />

Other factors that may contribute to resistance to change in service delivery<br />

include:<br />

• concern about the costs associated with change, e.g. the fear that costs of<br />

finding new vendors could outweigh costs involved in managing existing<br />

contracts<br />

• governance structures <strong>and</strong> skills, e.g. the structures <strong>and</strong> skills needed to manage<br />

in-house service production can be quite different from those needed to contract<br />

outside vendors<br />

• specific jurisdictional characteristics, such as management capacity (e.g. for<br />

evaluation), management structures (especially the relationship between politicians<br />

<strong>and</strong> administrators) <strong>and</strong> the competitiveness of the market. 62<br />

Therefore, when analysing local government service-delivery models, it is wise to<br />

consider the history of services in a locality <strong>and</strong> the path dependency of servicedelivery<br />

models, alongside the attitudes of public officials.<br />

59 Serrao-Neumann et al. 2015.<br />

60 Lamothe, Lamothe <strong>and</strong> Feiock 2008, 48.<br />

61 Lamothe, Lamothe <strong>and</strong> Feiock 2008.<br />

62 Lamothe, Lamothe <strong>and</strong> Feiock 2008, 28–34.<br />

342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!