06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

amounts on infrastructure projects big <strong>and</strong> small across most regions is the best<br />

way to fund regional development’. 52<br />

In 2017, the Commonwealth released its ‘Regions 2030 – Unlocking<br />

Opportunity’ policy. 53 Despite its new name, the policy includes elements of many<br />

of its predecessors <strong>and</strong> of the ‘new’ paradigm, focusing on local decision making,<br />

tailor-made regional solutions <strong>and</strong> unlocking regional economies, all without a<br />

new funding model. Despite various experiments, regional bodies with political<br />

power have never become a fixed part of the regional administrative l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong><br />

Commonwealth regionalisation, in particular, has always been controversial. 54<br />

The lack of stable leadership in the federal ministry has undermined<br />

commitment <strong>and</strong> policy coherence. Federal leadership changes since 2010 <strong>and</strong><br />

major political disruptions associated with citizenship credentials of politicians<br />

have meant that regional development has not been a focus of successive<br />

governments, <strong>and</strong> the portfolio has lacked ministerial <strong>and</strong> hence leadership<br />

consistency. Since 2010 there have been ten ministers with responsibility for the<br />

RDA network. Not surprisingly, regional development policy has been described as<br />

‘fragmented’ by a range of commentators <strong>and</strong> researchers. 55<br />

Conclusions<br />

Regional Australia is, as you would expect, unique. However, many of Australia’s<br />

current regional development policies are not dissimilar to those of other First<br />

World nations, despite Australia’s significant climatic, political, geographic,<br />

environmental <strong>and</strong> economic differences. Nonetheless non-metropolitan areas are<br />

often viewed as the policy periphery, struggling to maintain population, vibrancy<br />

<strong>and</strong> viability as businesses <strong>and</strong> people are drawn to the political <strong>and</strong> economic<br />

centres located in capitals.<br />

While <strong>Australian</strong> regional development policy dictates that the regions should<br />

have considerable autonomy because they underst<strong>and</strong> local context, conditions <strong>and</strong><br />

potential opportunities, the resources <strong>and</strong> decision-making power tend to reside<br />

in Canberra or the respective state capitals. Despite the Commonwealth claiming<br />

that regional development is the remit of the states for most of the last 120 years, it<br />

dictates overarching national policy by virtue of its fiscal dominance. Furthermore,<br />

it has considerable power over the other spheres of government <strong>and</strong> the outcomes<br />

for rural, regional <strong>and</strong> remote communities. The states also play a significant role<br />

in regional development, dictating how resources will be spent <strong>and</strong> where; ‘thus<br />

regional Australia’s organisations, institutions <strong>and</strong> governance mechanisms remain<br />

52 Collits 2012, 28.<br />

53 Commonwealth of Australia 2017.<br />

54 Kelly, Dollery <strong>and</strong> Grant 2009, 181–2.<br />

55 Beer, Maude <strong>and</strong> Pritchard 2003; Commonwealth of Australia 2016; Dollery, Buultjens <strong>and</strong><br />

Adams 2011.<br />

684

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!