06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Although Australia is a vastly urban nation, attempts by the federal government<br />

to articulate a national urban policy have been episodic. Urban planning is a key<br />

tool in the urban policy toolkit. The intra-governmental arrangements around<br />

urban planning are therefore important. In this context, it is important to note<br />

that:1)localgovernmentisnotreferredtointheConstitutionofthe<strong>Australian</strong><br />

Commonwealth – local governments' responsibility for managing regulatory<br />

planning at the local level is deferred from the states/territories; 2) in the absence of<br />

a national urban policy, the federal government does not have any direct political<br />

oversight over urban planning at the state/territory level; but 3) the federal<br />

government may provide funding to the states/territories for large-scale infrastructure<br />

in cities, either as block funding or through one-off arrangements (such<br />

as City Deals, below). Therefore, the states/territories are powerful actors in urban<br />

<strong>and</strong> regional planning in Australia, but urban policy <strong>and</strong> infrastructure funding<br />

tensions are present between the federal government <strong>and</strong> the states/territories.<br />

National urban policy<br />

Globally, interest in formulating national urban policy peaked in the 1970s, with<br />

high levels of government intervention aimed at realising equity goals through<br />

provision of public housing <strong>and</strong> other public goods. The highpoint in Australia was<br />

the Whitlam government's (1972–75) urban <strong>and</strong> housing development initiatives,<br />

which focused on the rapidly growing suburbs. During the 1972 election campaign,<br />

Gough Whitlam famously explained that:<br />

a national government which cuts itself off from responsibility for the nation’s<br />

cities is cutting itself off from the nation’s real life. A national government which<br />

hasnothingtosayaboutcitieshasnothingrelevantorenduringtosayaboutthe<br />

nation or the nation’s future. 22<br />

Following the shift to efficiency goals, the most notable federal interest in cities<br />

was expressed in the Hawke–Keating government’s ‘Building Better Cities’ program<br />

(1991–96), which focused on the renewal of former industrial sites in the inner<br />

city to provide higher density housing (in Pyrmont <strong>and</strong> Ultimo in inner Sydney,<br />

inner Melbourne <strong>and</strong> inner north-eastern Brisbane) as well as the redevelopment<br />

of mainly government-owned l<strong>and</strong> in East Perth.<br />

However, more recently, cities have crept back up the national policy agenda,<br />

reflecting growing underst<strong>and</strong>ing of their role as the underpinning drivers for<br />

national economies. In 2011, the Rudd–Gillard government launched a national<br />

urban policy, ‘Our Cities, Our Future’, 23 which sought to guide public intervention<br />

<strong>and</strong> private investment around four themes that remain widely deployed in<br />

22 Whitlam 1972.<br />

23 <strong>Australian</strong> Government Department of Infrastructure <strong>and</strong> Transport 2011.<br />

716

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!