06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

sectors. Consequently, they also questioned their capacity to manage these issues<br />

through traditional bureaucratic structures <strong>and</strong> methods. 22 Perceptions that the<br />

public service had become ‘a self-contained elite exercising power in the interests<br />

of the status quo but without effectively being accountable for its exercise’ 23 led to<br />

reviews <strong>and</strong> changes that aimed to restore ministerial control.<br />

The most important set of public sector practices <strong>and</strong> values that emerged<br />

in the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s is collectively described as the new public management<br />

(NPM), <strong>and</strong> is still highly influential today. NPM aimed to make government more<br />

efficient <strong>and</strong> effective, based on ideas derived from economic theory <strong>and</strong> business<br />

management techniques. Its proponents called for the public sector’s monopoly<br />

over policy making <strong>and</strong> service delivery to be removed or at least reduced. (The<br />

Howard government’s minister for administrative services applied a ‘yellow pages’<br />

test: if a business was listed in the business phone directory, the minister argued<br />

thattherewasnoreasonwhyitshouldbeprovidedbygovernment.) 24<br />

Instead, the NPM’s objectives included giving users more choice in the services<br />

they received, making more use of market-type competition, <strong>and</strong> foreshadowed<br />

a program of widespread privatisations <strong>and</strong> the separation of service delivery<br />

agencies from their parent policy departments. They called for a greater focus<br />

on financial incentives <strong>and</strong> transparent performance management in public sector<br />

organisation. 25 The classic NPM text Reinventing government 26 coined the phrase<br />

‘steering, not rowing’ to advocate less involvement by the public sector in actually<br />

delivering services <strong>and</strong> more focus on policy making <strong>and</strong> on the choice <strong>and</strong> design<br />

of such services. 27<br />

A summary of NPM’s characteristics, such as ‘disaggregation, competition <strong>and</strong><br />

incentivization’, 28 is provided in Table 1. In practice, NPM was not always adopted<br />

forthesamereasons<strong>and</strong>didnotalwaysconsistofthesamepolicymixwhen<br />

implemented. 29<br />

22 Other potential explanations of NPM point to more endogenous developments within<br />

bureaucracies themselves, such as the impact of new technologies that allowed work to be<br />

refashioned along private sector lines.<br />

23 Royal Commission on <strong>Australian</strong> Government Administration (1976), quoted in Wanna <strong>and</strong><br />

Weller 2003, 87.<br />

24 Aulich <strong>and</strong> O’Flynn 2007, 160.<br />

25 Hood 1991, 5.<br />

26 Osborne <strong>and</strong> Gaebler 1992.<br />

27 Denhardt <strong>and</strong> Denhardt 2015, 11; Osborne <strong>and</strong> Gaebler 1992, 32; Pollitt 2002, 276.<br />

28 Dunleavy et al. 2006.<br />

29 Dunleavy et al. 2006; Hood 1995; Pollitt 2002; Pollitt 1995.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!