06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

‘evidence-based policy’ movement in the 1990s <strong>and</strong> early 2000s. 38 The movement<br />

grew out of the UK <strong>and</strong> was also taken up in <strong>Australian</strong> policy circles, supported<br />

primarily on the basis that it provides a foundation for improved public policy<br />

decision making grounded in objective ‘truth’ rather than ideology, <strong>and</strong> can also<br />

improve efficiencies <strong>and</strong> outcomes. 39 However, what this commitment means in<br />

practice remains somewhat murky. For instance, evidence-based policy raises<br />

questions about which types of evidence should be relied upon, how well they<br />

approximate‘truth’,howtheyshouldbeused,<strong>and</strong>towhatextenttheycanorshould<br />

influence policy outcomes. 40<br />

There is a great deal of contestability regarding the value of various types of<br />

evidence for policy development. For instance, there continues to be much debate<br />

regarding the utility of ‘evidence hierarchies’, which generally place greater value<br />

on evidence produced through experimental <strong>and</strong> quasi-experimental quantitative<br />

studies 41 over evidence produced through qualitative inquiry. 42 This preference for<br />

particular research methods over others, however, shapes <strong>and</strong> moulds the types of<br />

knowledge that are able to be produced, often favouring positivist ontologies (that<br />

is, those that perceive the world as objectively ‘knowable’ <strong>and</strong> ‘measurable’, typically<br />

through rational scientific means). As Marston <strong>and</strong> Watts argued:<br />

If knowledge operates hierarchically, we begin to see that far from being a neutral<br />

concept, evidence-based policy is a powerful metaphor in shaping what forms of<br />

knowledge are considered closest to the ‘truth’ in decision-making processes <strong>and</strong><br />

policy argument. 43<br />

There are many arguments for the inclusion of richer forms of knowledge in social<br />

policy inquiry <strong>and</strong> design: forms of knowledge that do not necessarily appear at<br />

the top of evidence hierarchies. This is particularly the case in the social sciences,<br />

because despite common assumptions that particular policies or programs can<br />

directly produce certain anticipated outcomes, trajectories of change are rarely<br />

simple or linear when dealing with humans’ lived experiences. 44 Any change in an<br />

individual’slifeismorelikelytobetheresultoftheintricateinterplayofpersonal<br />

<strong>and</strong> environmental factors rather than any policy or program alone. 45 Thick<br />

qualitative description can be particularly useful in teasing out these complexities<br />

38 Nutley, Davis <strong>and</strong> Walter 2002.<br />

39 Head 2009.<br />

40 Marston <strong>and</strong> Watts 2003.<br />

41 That is, studies that use either r<strong>and</strong>omly or non-r<strong>and</strong>omly sampled/allocated control groups to<br />

isolate the effects of the variable(s) being studied.<br />

42 For example, detailed qualitative case studies; see also, the Maryl<strong>and</strong> Scientific Methods Scale in<br />

What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth 2018.<br />

43 Marston <strong>and</strong> Watts 2003, 145.<br />

44 Woolcock 2013.<br />

45 Lowe <strong>and</strong> Wilson 2015.<br />

694

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!