06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regional policy<br />

interrelated causes. 22 First, the neoliberal reforms’ contribution to regional socioeconomic<br />

disadvantage was becoming apparent, <strong>and</strong> second, the government was<br />

forced to consider the adverse implications of their reforms on the 1993 federal<br />

election. 23 Government was increasingly challenged by regional voter dissatisfaction<br />

as services <strong>and</strong> infrastructure were rationalised or withdrawn <strong>and</strong> local<br />

capacity in the regions was compromised.<br />

The Hawke <strong>and</strong> Keating governments prepared numerous regional development<br />

reports between 1990 <strong>and</strong> 1993, emphasising bottom-up, local entrepreneurship<br />

but with limited funding support. The Kelty Report (Developing Australia:<br />

a regional perspective) on regional economic development 24 was launched in<br />

December 1993 by the federal government, with high hopes that employment<br />

difficulties <strong>and</strong> low incomes being experienced in many regional communities<br />

would be addressed. The report proposed the establishment of Regional Economic<br />

Development Organisations (REDOs) (later Regional Development Organisations<br />

[RDOs] <strong>and</strong> Area Consultative Committees [ACCs]) across Australia to develop<br />

individual regional strategies, promote regional development <strong>and</strong> improve policy<br />

co-ordination between federal, state <strong>and</strong> local governments, a strategy that was<br />

subsequently taken up in the federal government’s Working Nation program in<br />

1994.<br />

Working Nation was a departure from previous approaches as it viewed<br />

‘government as facilitator, rather than the driving force’, 25 but the overarching<br />

message was still self-reliance. Australia’s geography, its spatial imbalances <strong>and</strong><br />

the high concentration of its populations on the coastal fringes raised particular<br />

problems for government. In the absence of a coherent national policy for urban<br />

<strong>and</strong> regional development, jointly implemented by federal <strong>and</strong> state governments,<br />

there was limited manoeuvrability for the redress of regional inequality.<br />

The agricultural sector was particularly hard hit by the transition from a<br />

favoured, government-supported industry sector to one that was expected to<br />

compete internationally without government subsidies or other protection.<br />

Economies of scale, technological primacy <strong>and</strong> increased harnessing of scientific<br />

<strong>and</strong> economic efficiencies dem<strong>and</strong>ed capital investment, <strong>and</strong> inevitably caused<br />

the failure of inefficient operations. These changes, over a relatively short period<br />

of time, accelerated a process of decline in parts of regional Australia that had<br />

historically been economically <strong>and</strong> socially dependent on agricultural production.<br />

22 Tonts <strong>and</strong> Haslam McKenzie 2005, 187.<br />

23 Tonts <strong>and</strong> Haslam McKenzie 2005.<br />

24 Taskforce on Regional Development 1993.<br />

25 Kelly, Dollery <strong>and</strong> Grant 2009, 181.<br />

677

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!