06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

procedures that influence behaviour through what is considered by a given society<br />

to be ‘appropriate’. 8 Hall <strong>and</strong> Soskice 9 differentiate between two main types of<br />

capitalism: liberal market economies <strong>and</strong> co-ordinated market economies. In<br />

liberal market economies, such as Australia, Canada, the USA, the UK <strong>and</strong> New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>, firms tend to operate at arm’s length from other firms <strong>and</strong> governments,<br />

<strong>and</strong> interact through competition <strong>and</strong> formal contracting. In many ways, the<br />

‘invisible h<strong>and</strong>’ of the market is left to guide the equilibrium of supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong><br />

of goods <strong>and</strong> services. 10 In co-ordinated market economies, such as Germany,<br />

Japan <strong>and</strong> Sweden, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, firms tend to be more collaborative in their<br />

relationships, <strong>and</strong> interactions with other firms <strong>and</strong> governments tend to be more<br />

strategic in attaining equilibrium in supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

While the macro level is useful in underst<strong>and</strong>ing comparative differences<br />

between countries in general, it is inherently weak in analysing what occurs at the<br />

meso or industry level, where practices within both liberal <strong>and</strong> co-ordinated market<br />

economies tend to be more diverse. For example, Australia’s market economy is<br />

relatively young, in comparison to the market economy of the USA, with many<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> industries either entirely owned by governments (such as the postal,<br />

telecommunications <strong>and</strong> energy industries) or heavily subsidised by governments<br />

(such as the agricultural, mining, textiles <strong>and</strong> automotive manufacturing industries)<br />

until market reforms were introduced in the 1970s <strong>and</strong> 1980s in line with<br />

international trends. Further, Australia’s health <strong>and</strong> education sectors, although<br />

increasingly subject to competitive pressures, remain predominantly governmentowned<br />

or controlled, underpinned by social expectations that governments will<br />

continue to provide or fund these services. If we take the two extremes at either end<br />

of the varieties of capitalism spectrum – the competitive market economy of the<br />

USA on the right <strong>and</strong> Sweden’s co-ordinated market economy on the left – Australia<br />

tends to fit somewhere in the middle, with competition occurring in some sectors<br />

of the economy <strong>and</strong> greater co-ordination occurring in others. 11<br />

The micro or firm level of analysis is typically adopted to examine the behaviour<br />

of firms in the political economy, such as participation by firms in business<br />

associations, strategic choices by firms in different policy environments, or to assess<br />

the extent of political activism by firms. 12<br />

While the scholarly study of government–business relations in the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

context has been largely situated as a sub-field of policy studies, it is inherently<br />

multidisciplinary. 13 The different levels of analysis place greater emphasis on<br />

different aspects of the government–business relationship, encompassing international<br />

political economy at the macro level, policy studies at the meso level <strong>and</strong><br />

8 March <strong>and</strong> Olsen 1989; Peters 2005, 30.<br />

9 Hall <strong>and</strong> Soskice 2001, 8.<br />

10 Smith 2003 [1776].<br />

11 Chaudhri, Samson <strong>and</strong> Kerin 2000, 21.<br />

12 Arnold <strong>and</strong> Hussinger 2004; Bell <strong>and</strong> Warhurst 1993; Sen <strong>and</strong> te Velde 2008.<br />

13 Bell <strong>and</strong> Wanna 1992, 5; Wanna 2003, 420.<br />

376

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!