06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Victoria<br />

Theupperhousewasasourceofsomecontroversyduringthesetimes.The<br />

1855 constitution gave the Legislative Council powers commensurate with those of<br />

the British House of Lords including the power to defeat Appropriation Bills <strong>and</strong><br />

thus force governments formed in the lower house to early elections. The Legislative<br />

Council exercised the power to block supply on 10 occasions, the last time being in<br />

1952 when it brought down a Country Party government. 10<br />

The 1952 blocking of supply occurred as a result of a political crisis within<br />

conservative politics over the state’s electoral laws. 11 Debates about the structure of<br />

lower house representation to accommodate rural fears about being overwhelmed<br />

bythepopulationofmetropolitanMelbournewerearguablythegreatestpolicy<br />

controversy in Victorian politics from self-government until the 1950s. At issue<br />

was rural malapportionment, where rural voters had greater capacity to elect<br />

representatives than metropolitan voters. Rural political interests fought tooth <strong>and</strong><br />

nail to protect voter inequality, <strong>and</strong> this split conservative politics. Spectacularly in<br />

1929, the Labor Party was to form a coalition government with the Country Party<br />

by promising to protect rural malapportionment, despite the fact that it was Labor<br />

voters, clustered in a h<strong>and</strong>ful of seats in Melbourne’s industrial western suburbs,<br />

whohadtheweakestvotingpowerinthestate.<br />

Labor’s desire to have executive power overrode its opposition to rural malapportionment.<br />

The Labor–Country coalition lasted for only a matter of months, <strong>and</strong><br />

left in its wake a long-lasting bitterness between the Country Party <strong>and</strong> the main<br />

anti-Labor Party of the time (initially the Nationalists, then the United Australia<br />

Party, <strong>and</strong> then the Liberal Party). The most explicit expression of this antipathy<br />

was to be found in the refusal of the two anti-Labor parties to form a coalition – a<br />

position that was maintained until 1990. 12<br />

This also contributed to governmental instability. With the vote split across<br />

three parties, absolute majorities in the Legislative Assembly were rare <strong>and</strong> most<br />

of the governments formed between the end of the First World War <strong>and</strong> the<br />

1950s were minority administrations that could collapse very quickly. Even those<br />

governments that did survive struggled to get legislation through a very conservative<br />

Legislative Council. So volatile were the times that Labor eventually got<br />

the opportunity to govern in its own right, having won a lower house majority in<br />

1947 <strong>and</strong> again in 1952 as the anti-Labor parties split over proposals to reform the<br />

electoral system. 13<br />

These Labor governments did not last long. In 1949, the Legislative Council<br />

blocked supply in protest at Labor’s policy of nationalising the private banks (the<br />

federal Labor government had passed legislation to do this in 1947, only for it to<br />

be overturned by the High Court). On the second occasion, the Labor Party itself<br />

10 Holmes 1976.<br />

11 Costar 2006, 248.<br />

12 Costar 1999, 90–1.<br />

13 Costar 2006, 235–8.<br />

299

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!