06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Perhaps somewhat ironically, it is in the cases in which legislation has been upheld<br />

that the inherently political nature of the High Court’s role in formulating <strong>and</strong><br />

applying the freedom of political communication <strong>and</strong> the right to vote is most clear.<br />

This is because in applying the ‘appropriate <strong>and</strong> adapted’ test the High Court judges<br />

are openly balancing the policy goals that the legislature has sought to achieve<br />

against their own assessment of the effect on, <strong>and</strong> value of having, an ability to vote<br />

or freedom of political communication.<br />

Conclusions<br />

While the courts’ role in Australia can be simply described as interpreting <strong>and</strong><br />

applying the law, in reality it is far more complex. This complexity is due to the<br />

myriad controversies that the courts must adjudicate upon, necessitating a<br />

combination of generalist <strong>and</strong> specialist courts that all sit within a hierarchy in<br />

which they are ultimately answerable to the High Court. It is also complex because<br />

choices may be made, particularly by the High Court when interpreting the<br />

Constitution, that have far reaching repercussions. These repercussions can extend<br />

to a change in the balance of power between state <strong>and</strong> federal governments or the<br />

protection of some rights from legislative encroachment.<br />

References<br />

Allan, James, <strong>and</strong> Nicholas Aroney (2008). An uncommon court: how the High Court of Australia<br />

has undermined <strong>Australian</strong> federalism. Sydney Law Review 30(2): 245–94.<br />

Aroney, Nicolas (2018). Constitutional fundamentals. In Augusto Zimmermann, ed. A commitment<br />

to excellence: essays in honour of Emeritus Professor Gabriel Moens. Brisbane: Connor Court<br />

Publishing.<br />

Burton Crawford, Lisa (2017). Theruleoflaw<strong>and</strong>the<strong>Australian</strong>Constitution. Ann<strong>and</strong>ale, NSW:<br />

Federation Press.<br />

Crawford, James, <strong>and</strong> Brian Opeskin (2004). <strong>Australian</strong> courts of law, 4th edn. Oxford; NewYork:<br />

Oxford University Press.<br />

Creyke, Robin, David Hamer, Patrick O’Mara, Belinda Smith <strong>and</strong> Tristan Taylor (2017). Laying down<br />

the law, 10th edn. Chatswood, NSW: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.<br />

Creyke, Robin, John McMillan <strong>and</strong> Marky Smyth (2015). Control of government action, 4th edn.<br />

Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths.<br />

French, Robert (2012). Two chapters about judicial power. Paper presented at the Peter Nygh<br />

Memorial Lecture 2012, 15th National Family Law Conference, 15 October.<br />

Galligan, Brian (1987). <strong>Politics</strong> of the High Court:a study of the judicial branch of government in<br />

Australia. St Lucia: University of Queensl<strong>and</strong> Press.<br />

Galligan, Brian, <strong>and</strong> F.L. (Ted) Morton (2017). <strong>Australian</strong> exceptionalism: rights protection without a<br />

bill of rights. In Tom Campbell, Geoffrey Goldsworthy <strong>and</strong> Adrienne Stone, eds. Protecting<br />

rightswithoutabillofrights:institutionalperformance<strong>and</strong>reforminAustralia, 17–39. London:<br />

Taylor <strong>and</strong> Francis.<br />

Gleeson, Murray (2008). The role of a judge in a representative democracy. Judicial Review 9(1):<br />

19–31.<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!