06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Under protectionism, policy instruments were used to restrict the impact of<br />

international competition. For example, secondary industries in Australia, such<br />

as the textile, clothing <strong>and</strong> footwear <strong>and</strong> automotive manufacturing industries,<br />

were protected by tariffs (government charges that increase the cost of cheaper,<br />

imported goods) <strong>and</strong> quotas (government-imposed limits on the number of goods<br />

imported). This approach to protecting domestic industries from international<br />

competition is known as barrier protectionism. Protectionism was a major form of<br />

industry policy in Australia <strong>and</strong> elsewhere from the end of the Second World War<br />

until recently. However, beginning in the 1970s, <strong>and</strong> in the 1980s under the Hawke<br />

government, Australia’s economy, following international trends, was increasingly<br />

the subject of trade liberalisation <strong>and</strong> competition reform. 28 This meant that tariffs<br />

<strong>and</strong> quotas were reduced or removed <strong>and</strong> domestic industries, particularly the<br />

textile, clothing <strong>and</strong> footwear <strong>and</strong> automotive manufacturing industries, faced<br />

increasing international competition. By the second decade of the 21st century,<br />

cheaper labour costs overseas meant that <strong>Australian</strong> manufacturing declined <strong>and</strong><br />

continue to decline as a result of the end of protectionism. 29<br />

One consequence of barrier protectionism for government–business relations<br />

was the concentration of lobbying forces from both manufacturing companies <strong>and</strong><br />

the related trade unions. As these industries relied on government protection to<br />

prosper, both capital <strong>and</strong> labour had an interest in the ongoing success of the<br />

sector. The sunk costs of lobbying <strong>and</strong> compliance, in addition to higher wages<br />

supported by inflated prices, provided little incentive for protected industries to<br />

seek efficiencies. As international trends in trade liberalisation led to numerous<br />

free trade agreements with other nations, other heavily subsidised sectors, such as<br />

agriculture, were also subjected to competition. Debates over the benefits of free<br />

trade versus protection continue as a result of the 2008–10 Global Financial Crisis<br />

<strong>and</strong>, more recently, in the USA under the Trump administration. Nevertheless, there<br />

is bipartisan agreement that Australia has prospered under trade liberalisation, with<br />

the Department of Foreign Affairs under a Labor government admitting that:<br />

The myth that lower tariffs destroy jobs has been debunked. Trade liberalisation<br />

has made the economy more flexible. The number of people employed in Australia<br />

in export-related activity in services such as finance, property <strong>and</strong> business<br />

services is increasing. 30<br />

Industry policy remains central to the government–business relationship,<br />

although as Australia continues to enter into free trade agreements under the rulesbased<br />

trading regime monitored by the World Trade Organization, the types of<br />

policy instruments adopted have changed. Today, there are two major types of<br />

28 Emmery 1999.<br />

29 ABS 2018.<br />

30 DFAT 2010, 34.<br />

380

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!