06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

ofthedistrict.Furthermore,suchelectoratesarepermittedtobemorethan20<br />

per cent lower than the average district allowance, compared to all other districts,<br />

which must be within a 10 per cent tolerance.<br />

Since 2005, the state’s electoral boundaries are determined by the three electoral<br />

distribution commissioners: a current or former Supreme Court judge (chair), the<br />

electoral commissioner <strong>and</strong> the government statistician.<br />

Electoral systems<br />

As is common to bicameral parliaments, WA’s two chambers are elected under<br />

different electoral systems.<br />

At the inception of responsible government, elections for the Assembly were<br />

conducted under first-past-the-post (plurality), combined with single-member<br />

electoral districts. In 1907, plurality was replaced with optional preferential voting<br />

(OPV), making WA the first <strong>Australian</strong> jurisdiction to introduce this method. In<br />

response to concerns from non-Labor parties about preference losses in threeway<br />

electoral contests, full preferential voting was adopted in 1911. 47 This system<br />

remainsinforcetoday.<br />

Elections for the Council occur under proportional representation using the<br />

single transferrable vote (PR-STV), introduced in 1987. 48 The present system<br />

superseded the 1965 regime, comprised of two-person electorates with staggered<br />

six-year terms, conducted under full preferential voting. 49<br />

Campaign finance <strong>and</strong> public funding<br />

Campaign finance restrictions were initially introduced in WA in 1904, in the form<br />

of election expenditure caps on c<strong>and</strong>idates. But it was not until 1996 that a more<br />

comprehensive scheme was adopted, with requirements for an annual disclosure of<br />

donations <strong>and</strong> electoral expenditure by parties <strong>and</strong> associated entities. The current<br />

disclosure threshold is $2,500. 50<br />

Public funding of elections was introduced in 2006. Under the provisions,<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idates can apply to be reimbursed for electoral expenditure they incurred if<br />

they secured more than 4 per cent of first preference votes (at $1.92713 per vote as<br />

at 1 July 2019).<br />

47 Phillips 2013.<br />

48 The original form of PR-STV used the ‘inclusive Gregory method’ to transfer unused ballot<br />

papers, or a portion thereof, won by elected c<strong>and</strong>idates. This was amended to the<br />

‘weighted-inclusive Gregory method’ in order to address an anomaly where a transferred ballot<br />

paper could potentially increase in value to more than one vote (Miragliotta 2002).<br />

49 Phillips 2013.<br />

50 In comparative terms, WA’s disclosure threshold as at 2019 is higher than most other<br />

comparable jurisdictions except SA ($5,191) <strong>and</strong> the Commonwealth ($13,800).<br />

324

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!