06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Western Australia<br />

distinct from the more populous ‘manufacturing’ eastern states. WA’s economy has<br />

depended heavily on exports, principally agricultural commodities <strong>and</strong> resources.<br />

This has meant that economic decisions that benefit the eastern economies have not<br />

always aligned with WA interests.<br />

One of the earliest indications of how economic differences could prompt<br />

a misalignment of policy preferences between WA <strong>and</strong> the federal government<br />

occurred with the introduction of a federal tariff in 1902. While the tariff was a<br />

boon for the eastern states, it represented a grave economic liability for the importdependent<br />

west. 30<br />

In more recent times, the federal government’s efforts to tax profits on nonrenewable<br />

resources reignited disaffection. The first iteration, the ill-fated Resource<br />

Super Profit Tax (RSPT) proposed by the Rudd national government in 2010, was<br />

perceived as imposing a disproportionate burden on the WA economy. As then-<br />

Premier Colin Barnett argued:<br />

With 65 per cent of this revenue coming from Western Australia, it was … an<br />

attack on the mining industry <strong>and</strong> on our resource income base. People talk about<br />

these resources belonging to all <strong>Australian</strong>s. Well, constitutionally, they don’t. They<br />

belongtothepeopleofeachstate. 31<br />

The second coming of the mineral tax, the Minerals Resources Rent Tax, while<br />

a watered-down version of the RSPT, was similarly unwelcomed by the WA government.<br />

When the tax was finally implemented in 2012, the WA government increased<br />

mining royalties, which miners could offset against the federal tax. This action<br />

reduced the federal take of the tax by $160 million annually, 32 thus prompting a<br />

threat from the Commonwealth to withhold infrastructure funding from WA. 33<br />

The sense of disenfranchisement has been magnified by the belief that the<br />

Commonwealth has exploited the state’s resource-rich economy without fair recompense.<br />

The consequences of WA’s booming resource economy have collided with<br />

fiscalequalisationarrangementsthatareslowtoadjusttochangesintheeconomic<br />

fortunes of the states.<br />

WA’s concerns assumed particular urgency when the Commonwealth Grants<br />

Commission (CGC) recommended, in 2015, that WA’s share of Goods <strong>and</strong> Services<br />

Tax (GST) revenue be reduced from 37 per cent of the per capita average to 30<br />

per cent. The CGC justified its recommendation on the grounds that ‘Western<br />

Australia can raise so much more per capita in mining royalties at average rates,<br />

other things being equal … its capacity to raise revenue from most other tax<br />

bases is also above average, implying it requires less GST’. 34 However, the CGC’s<br />

30 Musgrave 2003, 99.<br />

31 Quoted in Kelly 2010<br />

32 Ker 2011.<br />

33 The federal mining tax was repealed in 2014.<br />

34 CGC 2015.<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!