06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

to benefit their self-interest). Parties <strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>idates are also utility maximisers,<br />

seeking the private benefits of public office <strong>and</strong>, therefore, electorally motivated<br />

<strong>and</strong> willing to adjust their policy offerings to match the preferences of the median<br />

voter. In doing this, parties provide voters with the greatest utility for their vote <strong>and</strong><br />

increase their chances of electoral success.<br />

Not all political scientists believe voters are rational actors though. The public’s<br />

general lack of knowledge about all but the most important political issues is one<br />

of the best documented findings in the social science literature, 5 with citizens’<br />

limitations as political actors causing some political scientists to question whether<br />

they are capable of acting as we might expect <strong>and</strong> hope, even in the modern era.<br />

American writer <strong>and</strong> political commentator Walter Lippmann 6 mirrored many<br />

earlier views of the public. He argued citizens were unable to behave rationally or<br />

think deeply. Similarly, one of the founders of modern public opinion research,<br />

Phillip E. Converse, 7 found that, in the 1950s <strong>and</strong> 1960s, only slim majorities of<br />

voters had even a basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how government worked. Fewer still held<br />

informed opinions on even the most salient policy matters, <strong>and</strong> the preferences<br />

they did hold lacked consistency across issues. Citizens’ answers to individual<br />

survey questions on one issue were largely unrelated to their answers to other<br />

questions on different (but related) topics. For instance, a respondent who wanted<br />

lower taxes would not always also support less spending. More broadly, very few<br />

voters were consistently on the left or right of the political spectrum.<br />

To make matters worse for normative concepts of democracy, citizens were also<br />

found by Lazarsfeld, Berelson <strong>and</strong> Gaudet, 8 Butler <strong>and</strong> Stokes, 9 <strong>and</strong>Converseto<br />

provide inconsistent answers when asked the same question at different times. A<br />

respondent, asked whether they supported higher spending or lower taxes one year,<br />

often completely changed their position when asked two years later.<br />

Much of the research from social psychology supports this cynicism about<br />

citizen competence. Psychological <strong>and</strong> experimental research has repeatedly<br />

demonstrated the irrationality of individuals 10 <strong>and</strong> the influence of context on<br />

preferences <strong>and</strong> decision making. 11 Citizens’ policy positions are often unstable<br />

<strong>and</strong> inconsistent. 12 Behaviour is frequently influenced by emotion 13 <strong>and</strong> framing. 14<br />

Voters use evidence incorrectly or prejudicially <strong>and</strong> are often overly confident about<br />

5 Converse 1975; Delli Carpini <strong>and</strong> Keeter 1996.<br />

6 Lippmann 1927; Lippmann 1922.<br />

7 Converse 1964.<br />

8 Lazarsfeld, Berelson <strong>and</strong> Gaudet 1968 [1948].<br />

9 Butler <strong>and</strong> Stokes 1973.<br />

10 Redlawsk <strong>and</strong> Lau 2013.<br />

11 Rabin 1998.<br />

12 Converse 1964.<br />

13 Brader 2012.<br />

14 Kahneman 2003; Kahneman <strong>and</strong> Tversky 1979; Tversky <strong>and</strong> Kahneman 1991.<br />

474

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!