06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Voter behaviour<br />

their conclusions, 15 <strong>and</strong> their acceptance of new evidence is clouded by motivated<br />

reasoning. 16<br />

Reconciling these findings with democratic theory<br />

Concerns about the capacity of citizens to meaningfully participate in electoral<br />

democracy are inconsistent with the general assumptions of classical democratic<br />

theory, which requires citizens to be informed <strong>and</strong> attentive for democracy to<br />

properly function. These concerns are typically reconciled with the normative<br />

ideals of democratic theory through the wisdom of the crowd argument. Aggregate<br />

opinion can be much more stable <strong>and</strong>, as a result, appear more ‘rational’ than<br />

individual opinion. 17 Even large proportions of r<strong>and</strong>om error ‘cancel out’ when<br />

aggregated, resulting in reasonably efficient <strong>and</strong> stable collective choices.<br />

There may also be some problems with the concerns about voter competence<br />

raised above. In a number of countries, representative democracy appears to be<br />

working relatively well. Lau <strong>and</strong> Redlawsk 18 estimate that, at the five US presidential<br />

elections between 1972 <strong>and</strong> 1988, approximately 75 per cent of citizens voted the<br />

same as they would have if they had been operating with ‘full information’. Here,<br />

full information is the decision they would make if they had the greatest possible<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the choice they were making <strong>and</strong> the alternatives.<br />

Lippmann <strong>and</strong> Converse may have been overly pessimistic about voters’<br />

political sophistication. It is possible that unrealistic goals were set for the average<br />

voter. There were also measurement problems with some of the earlier studies. The<br />

period in which Converse studied may also have been one with unusually low levels<br />

of ideological difference between the major political parties in the USA (where they<br />

conducted their research), making it harder for voters to underst<strong>and</strong> the difference<br />

between the parties or to adopt strong positions on many areas of policy. 19<br />

Gerald Pomper 20 studied the association between party identification <strong>and</strong> voter<br />

preferences on six issues between 1956 <strong>and</strong> 1968. Consistent with Converse’s<br />

findings, from 1956 to 1960 the relationship between party identification <strong>and</strong><br />

preferences was weak or non-existent. However, this relationship strengthened for<br />

all six issues between 1960 <strong>and</strong> 1964. Regardless of starting position, from 1964<br />

Democrats were more likely to be liberal <strong>and</strong> Republicans conservative in all of<br />

these policy areas.<br />

Earlier studies of voters’ political preferences also failed to take into account<br />

the measurement error inherent in public opinion surveys. Responses to these<br />

15 Gilovitch 1991.<br />

16 Bartels 2002.<br />

17 Page <strong>and</strong> Shapiro 1992.<br />

18 Lau <strong>and</strong> Redlawsk 1997.<br />

19 Nie, Verba <strong>and</strong> Petrocik 1976, 99, 179–80.<br />

20 Pomper 1972.<br />

475

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!