06.05.2013 Views

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CICERO<br />

language be governed by rules ('analogy') or by usage ('anomaly')? The<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>rian scholars had sought to identify underlying rules, whereas the<br />

Stoics, champions of Nature, accepted what was produced by evolution. At<br />

Rome the encyclopaedic scholar Varro (116—27 B.C.) in his partly extant De<br />

lingua Latina, while leaning towards analogy, made ample concessions to<br />

usage. A stricter analogist was Caesar, whose efficient <strong>and</strong> systematic mind<br />

wished to correct the language just as he corrected the calendar. His treatise<br />

De analogia was a scholarly work, dedicated, like most of the De lingua Latina,<br />

to Cicero.<br />

Strict analogy was associated with the Atticists, <strong>and</strong> as such it comes under<br />

attack in the Orator. Cicero's position was a sensible compromise. Thus he did<br />

not wish to alter phrases hallowed by tradition, nor to suppress exceptional<br />

forms which Nature had introduced for the sake of euphony. Though aware<br />

that it is incorrect to introduce an h into certain words such as pulcer <strong>and</strong><br />

Cartago, ' after a while — a long while — I allowed correctness to be forced out<br />

of me by what was dinned into my ears'. There were even fifty-four instances<br />

in his writings (half of them in letters) of the indicative mood in indirect<br />

question, which Caesar shunned <strong>and</strong> every modern schoolboy is taught to shun.<br />

Nevertheless he repeatedly enjoined correctness in his rhetorical works; he<br />

taunted Mark Antony in the senate with using the superlative form piissimus,<br />

'a word which does not exist in Latin'; <strong>and</strong> he took both his son <strong>and</strong> his<br />

secretary to task in letters for solecisms.<br />

As to vocabulary, the purists sought to establish a 'proper' word for every<br />

thing or idea. In public speeches it was obviously important to make your<br />

meaning clear <strong>and</strong> not to give your hearers a sense of ignorance or inferiority.<br />

It may have been in this context that Caesar gave his famous warning,' Avoid<br />

like a reef the unfamiliar or unusual word', but his taste was certainly fastidious.<br />

He held that selection of words was the beginning of eloquence, <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

Brutus Cicero makes Atticus say that Caesar 'speaks purer Latin than almost<br />

any orator'. 1 That 'almost' leaves room for Cicero himself. In his speeches<br />

Cicero was careful to use only good, established words still in general use. But<br />

he also insisted that they should be select words with some body <strong>and</strong> sonority.<br />

We find no instance of anything that looks like a new coinage, <strong>and</strong> only three<br />

instances of Greek words (all in the Verrines, about Sicily, <strong>and</strong> all carefully<br />

explained). Even naturalized Greek words occur only in one speech, In Pisonem,<br />

<strong>and</strong> there with ironical nuance. Aper in Tacitus' Dialogus singles Cicero out as<br />

one who applied selection to language, <strong>and</strong> Tulliana puritas is a phrase of St<br />

Jerome.<br />

Languages do need some defence, <strong>and</strong> Latin was particularly vulnerable in<br />

the conditions of the late Republic. Cicero remarked to Brutus, ' When you<br />

1<br />

252. Gell. 1.10.4.<br />

242<br />

Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!