06.05.2013 Views

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POETRY<br />

concerns the origins of astrology <strong>and</strong> the appearance of the heavens — their<br />

various zones <strong>and</strong> circles — concluding with a Virgilian finale, on the ability<br />

of the planets to presage the future. Book 2, after a proem which pays homage<br />

to Homer, Hesiod <strong>and</strong> other didactic poets, is devoted to the signs of the<br />

zodiac; the proem to Book 3 again concerns poetry, this time the difficulty of<br />

his theme compared to those of earlier writers, the bulk of the book being<br />

occupied by a treatment of the twelve athla which correspond to the signs. Book<br />

4 begins in Lucretian vein, inveighing against our mortal cares, then moves on<br />

to the power of fate in history, <strong>and</strong> thence to the character traits connected<br />

with the signs, the geographical regions which they govern, the ecliptic signs,<br />

<strong>and</strong> finally, a vindication of the view that the heavens foretell the future. Book 5,<br />

without more ado, launches into a discussion of the paranatellonta, the signs<br />

which appear at the same time as the constellations of the zodiac, but outside<br />

the zodiac itself: it finishes suddenly, after a comparison between the earthly<br />

order <strong>and</strong> the order of the heavens.<br />

Manilius' stylistic masters are Lucretius, 1 Virgil <strong>and</strong> Ovid. The old prosaic<br />

connectives are fully in evidence — ergo age, perspice nunc, quin etiam, accipe,<br />

nunc age, but there is a new polish, a new fluency, <strong>and</strong> a love of point, antithesis<br />

<strong>and</strong> word play: in terms of the rhetorical qualities of his verse, Manilius<br />

st<strong>and</strong>s half way between Ovid <strong>and</strong> Lucan. He knows the imagery of the<br />

Callimachean poetic, but when he writes of untrodden paths, trite epic themes,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the struggle to create, 2 he reflects not the master himself, but the mainstream<br />

Latin tradition: the Callimachean programme was now itself banal. 3<br />

Virgil is most obviously laid under contribution at the end of Book 1, where<br />

Manilius imitates the close of the first Georgic, incorporating echoes of<br />

the Furor &po«7is from Aeneid 1:<br />

iam bella quiescant<br />

atque adamanteis Discordia uincta catenis<br />

aeternos habeat frenos in carcere clausa. (i.22ff.)<br />

Now let wars end <strong>and</strong> Discord, tied with chains of adamant, be bound forever, coerced<br />

within a prison.<br />

Yet even here there is a suspect facility, a non-Virgilian ease, which is the legacy<br />

of Ovid. Ovidian influence, visible throughout, is clearest in the Andromeda<br />

digression of Book 5. 5496*".:<br />

1<br />

He worries less than Lucretius about using Greek terms, simply prefacing them with an apology,<br />

as at 2.693, 8 3°> 8 97 an ^ 3-4 1 -<br />

2<br />

Note luctanJum, 2.34: cf. the Callimachean TT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!