06.05.2013 Views

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

ENNIUS' ANN ALES<br />

I. THE SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE 'ANNALES'<br />

Ennius went further than Naevius in Hellenizing the form of Latin epic,<br />

shaping it in books which were to have aesthetic unity <strong>and</strong> casting it in Homer's<br />

hexameter. (The Bellum Pcem'cum was divided into seven books not by its<br />

author Naevius but by Octavius Lampadio, a contemporary of Accius, whose<br />

sense of decorum on this point was learnt from Hellenistic poets in general <strong>and</strong><br />

Ennius in particular (Suet. Gramm. 2).) The scale of the books was between<br />

about 1,000 <strong>and</strong> 1,700 lines each; the fragments amount to barely half such a<br />

book, <strong>and</strong> represent less than a twentieth of a poem which in its final form had<br />

eighteen books. Most fragments are assigned to their books, <strong>and</strong> grammarians<br />

<strong>and</strong> others allude to the contents of some: hence, <strong>and</strong> also because the subject<br />

matter was historical, narrated chronologically (though at very varying pace),<br />

attempts at reconstruction are saved from utter futility. Ennius appears to have<br />

organized his poem as five triads of books, each covering a coherent period of<br />

Rome's story. 1 These fifteen books spanned almost or exactly one thous<strong>and</strong><br />

years in the contemporary reckoning (1184/3 B - c - ~~ 187/184 B.C.), <strong>and</strong> this may<br />

be relevant to the architecture of the poem; see pp. 63—4. A sixth triad, which<br />

circulated separately, was added by Ennius in the last years of his life (d. 169 B.C.).<br />

The first triad covered the mythical era from the fall of Troy to the end of the<br />

regal period. As is usual with fragmentary authors, the first book is the best<br />

represented. It began with an invocation of the Muses. Ennius narrated a dream,<br />

formally recalling famous prooemia of Hesiod (Theogony) <strong>and</strong> Callimachus<br />

(Aetid),m. which he told how Homer's spirit appeared <strong>and</strong> revealed that he, Homer,<br />

was reincarnated in Ennius. This stupendous claim asserted the unique importance<br />

of Ennius' theme, but it is not clear how literally Ennius meant it. Allegory,<br />

though not yet literary allusion, was familiar to the public through tragedy; at<br />

the same time, Ennius himself was seriously interested in sub-Platonic astral<br />

mysticism <strong>and</strong> Pythagorean ideas of reincarnation, beliefs which were enjoying<br />

some fashion at Rome in the 180s <strong>and</strong> 170s B.C. 2 The narrative began with the<br />

1<br />

See F. Skutsch, RE v 1610, O. Skutsch (1968) 28 n. 4, Jocelyn (1971)<br />

2<br />

See BoyancS (1955) 171—92.<br />

60<br />

Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!