06.05.2013 Views

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POETRY<br />

characteristics. The first is the loosening of the link between form <strong>and</strong> content<br />

which has already been mentioned. Annianus' <strong>and</strong> Serenus* poems on the<br />

joys of country life follow neither the pattern of Virgil's Eclogues nor that of<br />

Tibullus' elegiac poems, but are written in a variety of metres. Avitus' poem<br />

on Roman history rejects the epic hexameter for the iambic dimeter, a metre<br />

found in the Epodes of Horace, <strong>and</strong> in choral passages in the tragedies of<br />

Seneca. The second trait common to these poets is metrical innovation, i.e.<br />

the creation of new metres by modification or combination of established<br />

patterns. Their third common feature is the ab<strong>and</strong>onment of the traditional<br />

vocabulary of the various poetic genres <strong>and</strong> the use of vulgar, archaic, rustic,<br />

diminutive <strong>and</strong> other forms. Whether these poets formed a School or not is a<br />

matter of debate. But they all in various degrees appear to have rejected much<br />

of the classical tradition of Latin poetry <strong>and</strong> attempted to strike out in new<br />

directions. The few fragments surviving suggest an antiquarian taste, a<br />

baroque embellishment of the trivial <strong>and</strong> a rather self-conscious avoidance of<br />

the gr<strong>and</strong> manner <strong>and</strong> the solemn tone of voice. None of them appears to have<br />

been more than a gifted minor versifier.<br />

In the period which is the subject of these chapters many of the trends<br />

marking the previous period continue to prevail. Minor subjects, a light, sometimes<br />

idyllic <strong>and</strong> sometimes frivolous tone, a taste for realism, are the order of<br />

the day at first. There are no long poems. The classical genres no longer<br />

impose themselves. But the elaborate metrical experiments of the later second<br />

century were ab<strong>and</strong>oned, <strong>and</strong> most of what was written was in the well-tried<br />

hexameter or elegiac couplet. Most of the productions of the third century <strong>and</strong><br />

the early fourth century cannot be securely dated; <strong>and</strong> sometimes the uncertainty<br />

extends even over more than a century. So there can be no question of<br />

reconstructing the history of poetry until we reach the second half of the<br />

fourth century. From the earlier part of the period we have a number of works,<br />

most of which can at best be dated somewhere between A.D. 250 <strong>and</strong> 350.<br />

Marcus Aurelius Olympius Nemesianus of Carthage was the author of a<br />

didactic poem in hexameters on hunting, the Cynegetica, of which only the<br />

first 325 lines survive, <strong>and</strong> of four bucolic poems modelled on those of Calpurnius<br />

Siculus. Poems on fishing (Halieuticd) <strong>and</strong> on sailing (Nauticd) are<br />

also attributed to him, but do not survive. The Cynegetica can be dated to c.<br />

A.D. 284, <strong>and</strong> appears to draw on the Greek poem on the same theme by<br />

Oppian of Apamea in Syria, written in the first half of the third century. In<br />

spite of his avoidance of legendary material <strong>and</strong> his claim to originality,<br />

Nemesianus* inspiration is purely literary. The Eclogues embody traditional<br />

pastoral themes: lament for the death of an old shepherd-poet, rival shepherds<br />

singing the praises of their respective loves, Pan appearing to shepherds, a<br />

singing match between two shepherds. Both the Cynegetica <strong>and</strong> the Eclogues<br />

693<br />

Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!