06.05.2013 Views

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX OF AUTHORS AND WORKS<br />

criticism', C.Ph. 15 (1920) 340—52; K. F. Smith, Martial the epigrammatist <strong>and</strong> other<br />

essays (Baltimore 1920); C. W. Mendell, 'Martial <strong>and</strong> the satiric epigram', C.Ph. 17<br />

(1922) 1-20; O. Weinreich, Studien ^u Martial (Stuttgart 1928); J. W. Spaeth,<br />

'Martial <strong>and</strong> Virgil', T.A.Ph.A. 6\ (1930) 19—28; K. Barwick, 'Zur Kompositionstechnik<br />

und Erklarung Martials', Philologus 87 (1932) 63—79; F. Sauter, Der rb'mische<br />

Kaiserkult bei Martial und Statius (Stuttgart—Berlin 1934); J. Kruuse, ' L'originalite<br />

artistique de Martial', C.&M. 4 (1941) 248-300; A. Nordh, 'Historical exempla in<br />

Martial', Eranos 52 (1954) 224-38; R. Helm, in RE VIIIA.I (1955) 55-85; K. Barwick,<br />

Martial und die %eitgenossische Rhetorik (Berlin 1959); H. Szelest, 'Martials satirische<br />

Epigramme und Horaz', Altertum 9 (1963) 27—37; J. Ferguson,' Catullus <strong>and</strong> Martial*,<br />

P.A.C.A. 6 (1963) 3-15; P. Laurens, 'Martial et l'e'pigramme grecque du Ier siecle<br />

apres J-C, R.E.L. 43 (1965) 315-41; E. Si<strong>eds</strong>chlag, Zur Form von Martials<br />

Epigrammen (Berlin 1977).<br />

CONCORDANCE: E. Si<strong>eds</strong>chlag (Hildesheim-New York 1979).<br />

IUVENALIS, DECIMUS IUNIUS<br />

LIFE<br />

b. A.D. 67 (?), d. sometime after 127 (last datable refs. Sat. 13.17,15.27). Not mentioned<br />

by any contemporary except Martial (Mart. 7.24 <strong>and</strong> 91, 12.18). Did not achieve<br />

popularity until 4th c. A.D.; see Highet (1956, under Studies below), <strong>and</strong> Coffey (under<br />

General works (2) above) 144—6 with notes. See above, pp. 603—4, for the problems,<br />

<strong>and</strong> authors <strong>and</strong> evidence cited there in notes; also G. Highet, T.A.Ph.A. 68 (1937)<br />

480-506; W. S. Anderson, C.Ph. 50 (1955) 255-7; G. Brugnoli, Studi Urbinati 37<br />

(1963) 5—14; Coffey (1963, under Bibliography below) 165—70.<br />

WORKS<br />

Fifteen complete satires, <strong>and</strong> a fragment of a sixteenth, divided into five books. Sat. 1<br />

composed after 100, Sat. 15 after 127. Additional thirty-six lines, generally agreed to be<br />

genuine <strong>and</strong> belonging to Sat. 6, were discovered in 1899; see Housman (under Texts<br />

below) xxix-xxx <strong>and</strong> xxxix-xl; Coffey (1963, under Bibliography below) 179-84; J. G.<br />

Griffith, Hermes 91 (1963) 104-14; G. Luck, H.S.Ph. 76 (1972) 217-32. The contention<br />

of O. Ribbeck, Der echte und der unechte Juvenal (Berlin 1865) that the later<br />

satires are not authentic is now discounted. For author-variants, see J. G. Griffith,<br />

Festschrift B. Snell (Munich 1956) 101-11; for interpolations, E. Courtney, B.I.C.S.<br />

22 ( T 975) i47-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!