Kenney_and_Clausen B.M.W.(eds.) - Get a Free Blog

APPENDIX OF AUTHORS AND WORKS
(2) Individual works. Aeneid: J. Henry (London, Edinburgh and Dublin 1873-89);
J. W. Mackail (Oxford 1930). Aen. 1: R. G. Austin (Oxford 1971). Aen. 2: idem
(Oxford 1964). Aen. 3: R.D.Williams (Oxford 1962). Aen. 4: A. S. Pease (Cambridge,
Mass. 1935); R. G. Austin (Oxford 1955). Aen. 5: R. D. Williams (Oxford i960). Aen.
6: E. Norden, 3rd ed. (Stuttgart 1926); F. Fletcher (Oxford 1941); R. G. Austin
(Oxford 1977). Aen. 7-8: C. J. Fordyce (Oxford 1977). Aen. 8: P. T. Eden (Leiden
1975); K. W. Gransden (Cambridge 1976). Aen. 12: W. S. Maguinness (London 1953).
Georgics: W. Richter (Munich 1957). Georg. 1 and 4: H. H. Huxley (London 1963).
Eclogues: R. Coleman (Cambridge 1977).
TRANSLATIONS: J. Dryden (1697); C. Day Lewis (1940-63). Eclogues:
P. Valery, Oeuvres I (1962) 207—22; G. Lee, Virgil's Eclogues (Liverpool 1980).
STUDIES. (1) GENERAL, and dealing particularly with Aeneid. C. A. Sainte-Beuve,
£tude sur Virgile (Paris 1857); W. Y. Sellar, The Roman poets of the Augustan age:
Virgil (Oxford 1877; 3rd ed. 1897); D. Comparetti, Vergil in the middle ages, tr.
E. F. M. Benecke (London 1885); R. Heinze, Virgils epische Technik (Leipzig 1903;
3rd ed. 1915); T. R. Glover, Virgil (London 1904; 7th ed. 1942); H. W. Prescott,
The development of Virgil's art (Chicago 1927); R. S. Conway, The Vergilian age
(Harvard U.P. 1928); R. M. Henry, 'Medea and Dido', C.R. 44 (1930) 97-108; C. S.
Lewis, A preface to Paradise Lost, ch. 6 (Oxford 1942); W. F. J. Knight, Roman Vergil
(London 1944; 2nd ed. 1966); E. Paratore, Virgilio (Rome 1945; 2nd ed. 1954); C. M.
Bowra, From Virgil to Milton (London 1945); T. S. Eliot, What is a classic? (London
'945); V. Poschl, Die Dkhtkunst Virgils: Bild und Symbol in der Aeneis (Innsbruck
1950; tr. Seligson, Michigan 1962); B. M. W. Knox, 'The serpent and the flame: the
imagery of the second book of the Aeneid', A.J.Ph. 71 (1950) 379-400; A. M.
Guillemin, Virgile (Paris 1951); J. Perret, Virgile, I'homme etVoeuvre (Paris 1952; 2nd
ed. 1965)^. A. Brooks,'Discolor aura: reflections on the Golden Bough', A.J.Ph.74
(1953) 260—80; E. M. W. Tillyard, The English epic and its background (London 1954);
K. Buchner, RE VIIIA (1955-8) 1021-1486, separately pubd Stuttgart 1961; G. B.
Townend,' Changing views of Vergil's greatness' C.J. 56 (1960-1) 67-77; M * Coffey,
'The subject matter of Virgil's similes', B.I.C.S. 8 (1961) 63-75; J. Lockwood,
'Virgil and his critics', P.V.S. 2 (1962-3) 1-8; A. Parry, 'The two voices of Virgil's
Aeneid', Arion 2 (4), (1963) 66f.; V. Buchheit, Vergil uber die Sendung Roms (Heidelberg
1963); Brooks Otis, Virgil: a study in civilised poetry (Oxford 1963); W. V.
Clausen, 'An interpretation of the Aeneid', H.S.C.Ph. 68 (1964) 139-47; M. C. J.
Putnam, The poetry of the Aeneid (Harvard 1965); (ed.) Steele Commager, Virgil,
Twentieth-Century Views (New Jersey 1966); R. D. Williams, Virgil, G.&R.,
New surveys in the classics 1 (1967; repr. with Addenda 1978); F. Klingner, Virgil
(Zurich 1967); K. Quinn, Virgil's Aeneid, a critical description (London 1968); R. G.
Austin, 'Virgil, Aeneid 6.384-476' P.V.S. 8 (1968-9) 51-60; (ed.) D. R. Dudley,
Virgil (Studies in Latin literature and its influence, London 1969); G. K. Galinsky,
848
Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008