02.06.2013 Views

00402

00402

00402

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

213<br />

di in this sentence can easily be replaced by<br />

preposition keu 'for,' which is the only preposition used<br />

for datives, as in (257).<br />

257. Ka-bri keu kee duwa boh.<br />

2y-give for I two CL<br />

'Give me two.'<br />

There is no question that the NP following keu in (257)<br />

is the dative, but as to the status of the NP following di<br />

in (256), there is a need for further discussion. In<br />

sentences involving more than one NP omitted, as in (256),<br />

di is very similar to keu. but in sentences like the<br />

following, we can see that they are different.<br />

258. Ka-bri keu lon boh mamplam nyan.<br />

2y-give for I fruit mango that<br />

'Give me that mango..'<br />

259. Ka-bri di lon boh mamplam nyan.<br />

2y-give SFC I fruit mango that<br />

' (As for me), give me that mango.'<br />

The two sentences look similar in form, and identical<br />

in translation. But these two sentences are very different<br />

in intonation. In (258), the verb and the dative is<br />

pronounced as a single phonological unit with the stress on<br />

the dative. In (258), the verb and the di phrase are<br />

pronounced separately. The voiced is raised a little on the<br />

verb, and the rest of the sentence receives low level

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!