00402

352
b) Guru geu-anggap-teuh salah.
Teacher 3r-consider-l£nc guilty
The teacher considers that we are guilty.'
c)*Guru geu-anggap salah.
Teacher 3r-consider guilty
In (113a), geutanvoe 'we^nc' is the subject of the
complement. In (113b) the subject of the complement is
missing and the higher verb has the enclitic -tSUJtt 'line'
which is the suffixal form of the subject of the complement.
(113c) is unacceptable because salah has nothing to
predicate. It will be acceptable if the proclitic on the
verb does not refer to guru 'teacher,' and the sentence will
mean that 'the teacher is considered guilty.'
We will focus on (113a) and (113b). It is not clear yet
if this is a phenomenon of raising to object or just a set
of two unrelated sentences. However, when the missing
subject in (113b) is inserted in its place, the result is
sentence (113a). The meaning of the two sentences also
indicates that they are related.
We will also exclude the possibility that the verb
anggap occurs in a structure of the form NP-V-NP-Complement.
The verb is very much' similar to the English verb consider,
which does not occur in that structure either. So, the NP
which is represented by the enclitic -teuh is not the second
NP shown in the structure NP-V-NP-Complement.