02.06.2013 Views

00402

00402

00402

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

251<br />

preceded by a preposition. A full form of pronoun or NP<br />

should be used in a PP (except when the NP is a<br />

demonstrative (2.4)), as also in bak lakoe-jih 'to her<br />

husband' in (7).)<br />

Likewise, after its introduction in (3), aneuk-geuh<br />

'her son' is only represented by cross-referencing in the<br />

clauses that follow: the last two clauses in (4), Ji-<br />

peutrok. and ji-jak mita keudeh keunoe. The preceding<br />

intervention of a clause in which ma is the subject does not<br />

cut off the continuity of aneuk-geuh because the two are<br />

distinguished by the level of politeness in their cross-<br />

referencing.<br />

Sometimes there is a need to focus or contrast a<br />

subject, which is done by using "subject focus di-" When<br />

this is done, the subject has to be represented by a full NP<br />

or pronoun, even in a clause where it is normally omitted.<br />

This is what happened to subject aneuk-geuh in (5); as we<br />

can see, this subject has been omitted in two consecutive<br />

preceding clauses.<br />

The third subject, peurumoh-jih 'his wife,' appears in<br />

full in (6). In the next clauses it is omitted and<br />

represented by cross-referencing, ji-peusuna. and ji-peugah<br />

nyang hflna-hana in (7), and ji-peugah bak lakoe-jih in (8).<br />

If a subject is introduced twice in two consecutive<br />

clauses or sentences in a story, the first time, as always,<br />

it is introduced in its most complete form, that is, in the<br />

form of an NP, which is often modified by a relative clause

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!