02.06.2013 Views

00402

00402

00402

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

425<br />

6.1.5.1.3 Method One versus Method Two<br />

As stated above, Method One is considered as the normal<br />

way of relativizing an object or a dative. It can be used in<br />

all circumstances. On the other hand, Method Two cannot<br />

always be used. It can only be used when there is a need to<br />

compare the NP which is relativized (what it does or<br />

undergoes) with another similar NP (what it does or<br />

undergoes). It is not the NP's which are compared, but<br />

rather, what different activities they do or what different<br />

states they undergo.<br />

When we say (126b), it implies that there are other<br />

bananas that he wants to sell, and these bananas are not<br />

eaten by goats. (127b) implies that besides the shirts that<br />

the man does not like, there are other shirts that he likes,<br />

and these shirts are not new. (128b) is used if we want to<br />

compare what the reactions of two or more children. The one<br />

who was not given anything was crying, but the others are<br />

not crying or happy.<br />

If there is no need to make such a comparison, this<br />

method cannot be used. For example, if there is only one<br />

object, this method cannot be used because there is nothing<br />

to compare. (128b) will be unacceptable if there is only one<br />

child at the place. In such a context, the sentence must be<br />

expressed in the form of (128c) below, which is the form<br />

produced by Method One.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!