05.04.2016 Views

Modern Engineering Thermodynamics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

454 CHAPTER 13: Vapor and Gas Power Cycles<br />

WHO WAS JAMES WATT? Continued<br />

The Boulton and Watt company was very successful<br />

and manufactured steam engines for many years, including<br />

the engine used in 1807 by Robert Fulton (1765–<br />

1815) on the first American steamboat, the Clermont<br />

(Figure 13.5).<br />

Over the years Watt made many important technological<br />

advances including automatic controls (the centrifugal<br />

governor), safety devices (the pressure gauge), and efficiency<br />

improvements (the double-acting cylinder).<br />

FIGURE 13.5<br />

An illustration of Robert Fulton’s steamboat Clermont.<br />

The term horsepower was introduced by Savery as a measure<br />

of how many horses driving a mechanical pump were<br />

replaced by his fire engine. However, as a unit of power<br />

measurement, it lacked a precise definition until Watt carried<br />

out experiments in about 1780 to determine how<br />

much power an average horse could deliver on a continuous<br />

basis. He then multiplied this value by a factor of 2 to<br />

ensure that, when he sold engines rated at a given horsepower,<br />

the purchasers would have no complaints as to their performance. Using this technique, he finally arrived at<br />

the figure of 33,000 ft·lbf/min as his horsepower definition. In addition to his conservative two-horse horsepower<br />

definition, some other equivalences that Watt felt were valid are 1 horsepower = 2 average horses = 3 powerful oxen = 12 men<br />

working cranks = 396 gallons of water falling 10 ft in 1 min. Much later, the electrical unit of power was named after<br />

him, 1 watt = 1volt· ampere (and 1 hp = 746 W).<br />

By 1800, Watt’s improvements had increased the thermal efficiency of a full-size Newcomen steam engine by about a factor<br />

of 4. But, even then, the overall thermal efficiency was only around 4 or 5%. This was to be the upper limit of atmospheric<br />

engine thermal efficiency, because they were soon to be replaced by a new technological breakthrough: the high-pressure,<br />

expansion steam engine. 5<br />

4 This occurred because small-scale models magnify the inefficiencies that arise from heat loss from the engine’s surface to the atmosphere. Since the<br />

surface area to volume ratio of a given geometric shape always increases as the physical dimensions of the shape decrease, small heat engine models are<br />

inherently much less efficient than their full-scale counterparts.<br />

5 It has been estimated that the upper limit of the thermal efficiency of the reciprocating atmospheric steam engine using the technology available in 1915<br />

was less than 15%.<br />

BOILER EXPLOSIONS AND EXPANSION STEAM ENGINES<br />

Before the early 19th century, high-pressure steam (anything over about 10 psig) was considered extremely dangerous.<br />

Explosions of the primitive boilers of Savery’s time caused much damage and loss of life and traumatized steam engine<br />

manufacturers. But new boiler materials and manufacturing and testing techniques in the early 1800s allowed operational<br />

steam pressures many times the single atmosphere of pressure available to Watt’s engines. Engines of 100 psig were common<br />

by 1840, and 200 psig was in use by 1880. High-pressure engine technology brought another quantum leap in thermal<br />

efficiency, another factor of 3, from Watt’s 4 to 5% in 1800 to 12 to 15% by 1850.<br />

High-pressure engines used the pressure of the steam to push the piston by expanding against it, rather than having atmospheric<br />

pressure push the piston into a vacuum as the atmospheric engines had done. Thus, they were known as expansion<br />

engines. By the 1820s, high-pressure engines were sufficiently efficient that Watt’s condenser unit was no longer considered<br />

to be essential, and consequently the steam was often exhausted from the cylinder directly into the atmosphere. The condenser<br />

always increased the engine’s thermal efficiency somewhat, but if the piston-cylinder was not cooled during each<br />

cycle (as it was in the Newcomen atmospheric engines but not in the newer expansion engines), this effect was minimal.<br />

The elimination of the condenser and its attendant pump simplified the engine’s construction and further reduced its cost<br />

and size, with only a small loss in thermal efficiency. At this point, the steam engine was finally small enough to become<br />

truly portable and its application to locomotion on land (railroads) and water (steamboats) produced new transportation<br />

technologies that changed the face of the world.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!