05.04.2016 Views

Modern Engineering Thermodynamics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

13.10 <strong>Modern</strong> Steam Power Plants 483<br />

4<br />

Mercury boiler<br />

Mercury condenser<br />

8<br />

3<br />

Water boiler<br />

5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

W Hg<br />

T<br />

4<br />

3 2<br />

1<br />

Mercury vapor dome<br />

Mercury cycle<br />

5<br />

Steam cycle<br />

7<br />

Water condenser<br />

(a) Equipment schematic<br />

6<br />

W H2 O<br />

8<br />

7 6<br />

s<br />

(b) Thermodynamic T–s diagram<br />

Steam vapor dome<br />

FIGURE 13.32<br />

A mercury-water binary power plant.<br />

No known fluid meets all seven of these conditions quite as well<br />

as water. But other fluids meet some of these conditions significantly<br />

better than water. For example, the critical state of mercury<br />

is at 1649°F and 2646 psia, which meets item 1 much<br />

better than water, whose critical state is 705°F and 3204 psia.<br />

However, the saturation pressure of mercury at 100°F isavery<br />

high vacuum (thus violating item 3). At 1000°F, the saturation<br />

pressure of mercury is about 180 psia, which makes it attractive<br />

for use in a dual working fluid or binary cycle system, as shown<br />

in Figure 13.32. Here, the mercury condenser also serves as the<br />

steam generator, and the combined binary cycle thermal efficiency<br />

is much higher (in the range of 50–60% for isentropic<br />

systems) than either one operating alone (in the range of 30–<br />

40% for isentropic systems).<br />

Between the 1930s and 1960s, several mercury-water binary<br />

cycle power plants were put into commercial operation. But,<br />

despite their superior thermal efficiencies, the problems of high<br />

initial cost, mercury toxicity, and numerous operating and maintenance problems prevented such plants from<br />

being commercially successful. However, the use of two or more working fluids within the same power plant<br />

still holds promise for significantly improving overall thermal performance in the future.<br />

Supercritical power plants were developed after 1950 with boiler pressures as high as 5000 psia at 1200°F.<br />

Figure 13.33 illustrates a supercritical Rankine cycle with two stages of reheat. However, the high operating<br />

and maintenance costs of supercritical plants often offset the cost benefits due to their increased thermal<br />

efficiencies.<br />

T<br />

Supercritical boiler<br />

s<br />

First reheat<br />

Second reheat<br />

FIGURE 13.33<br />

A supercritical Rankine cycle with two stages of<br />

reheat.<br />

EXAMPLE 13.8<br />

The Philadelphia Electric Power Company Eddystone Power Plant has the highest operating conditions of any electrical<br />

generating facility in the world. The boiler has a supercritical outlet state of 5000. psia at 1200.°F. After expansion in the<br />

first and second stages of the turbine, the steam is reheated to 1000.°F at 1000. psia and to 1000.°F at 300. psia, respectively.<br />

The condenser pressure is 0.400 psia, and the power plant has eight regenerators. The steam mass flow rate is<br />

1.50 × 10 6 lbm/h and the power plant produces 325 MW of electrical power. Neglecting the eight regenerators in this<br />

plant, determine<br />

a. The isentropic thermal efficiency of this power plant.<br />

b. The isentropic efficiency of the turbine-generator power unit.<br />

Solution<br />

First, draw a sketch of the system (Figure 13.34).<br />

(Continued )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!