05.04.2016 Views

Modern Engineering Thermodynamics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

700 CHAPTER 17: <strong>Thermodynamics</strong> of Biological Systems<br />

Work done (W)<br />

Heat loss (Q)<br />

Waste energy out<br />

Food energy in<br />

FIGURE 17.5<br />

Energy flows in living systems.<br />

Life processes all have some degree of irreversibility. Therefore, _Q normally is negative since the internal irreversibilities<br />

generally produce internal heat generation, which must be removed from the system if the system is<br />

not to overheat.<br />

Classically, the concept of work in thermodynamic analysis has been somewhat ambiguous. As discussed in<br />

Chapter 4, during the development of thermodynamics, it was convenient to separate the changes in kinetic and<br />

potential energies from the work term. These energy terms are written separately and usually grouped with the<br />

system’s total internal energy change, as shown in Eq. (17.11). Thus, the work term in the thermodynamic<br />

energy balance encompasses all the work transport of energy into or out of a system except the work associated<br />

with changes in the system’s kinetic and potential energy. This can be quite confusing when analyzing biological<br />

systems, since one of their major work modes in a social or cultural context is that of mobility, that is, running<br />

and climbing, which are the kinetic and potential energy terms we are discussing. Also, whereas a classical thermodynamic<br />

system can either do work or have work done on it, in general, a biological system only does work<br />

(i.e., the work term is always negative).<br />

As with nonliving work-producing systems, we can define an energy conversion efficiency as<br />

Desired energy result<br />

Energy conversion efficiency = η E = (17.12)<br />

Required energy input<br />

The term energy used in this equation must include relevant kinetic and potential energy changes. For example,<br />

the energy conversion efficiency of a human climbing a hill could be calculated by choosing the change in<br />

potential energy of the person as the desired energy output, while ignoring other types of energy output simultaneously<br />

performed (such as aerodynamic drag against the atmosphere). This is acceptable, providing the meaning<br />

of the efficiency is clearly defined in each case.<br />

The required energy input part of Eq. (17.12) is more difficult to evaluate. Since, for warm-blooded animals,<br />

the net _Q is always out of the system, it cannot be considered as a source of energy input. Also, one cannot<br />

generally input useful energy into a biological system via changes in the system’s kinetic or potential energies.<br />

Thus, what remains is<br />

Required energy input = − dU<br />

dt<br />

Then, we may write Eq. (17.12) as<br />

η E =<br />

_W + d <br />

mV 2<br />

+ d <br />

mgZ<br />

dt 2g c dt g c<br />

= 1 +<br />

−dU/dt<br />

_Q<br />

−dU/dt<br />

(17.13)<br />

and since both _Q and dU/dt are always negative, it is clear that Eq. (17.13) gives an energy conversion efficiency<br />

that is always less than 100%.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!