October 2010<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Logistics</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Sector</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Shores</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Western</strong> Mediterranean1.1. Descripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Logistics</str<strong>on</strong>g> Clusters <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Shores</strong>: OverviewFigure 1.1.1 Populati<strong>on</strong> Distributi<strong>on</strong> and Network <strong>of</strong> Infrastructure in <strong>the</strong> MaghrebIn terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic and regulatory c<strong>on</strong>text which underpins and c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>the</strong>transport and logistics sector, <strong>the</strong> following factors are <strong>of</strong> note:In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Morocco and Tunisia, <strong>the</strong>re are explicit ec<strong>on</strong>omic policies for tighteningrelati<strong>on</strong>s with <strong>the</strong> European Uni<strong>on</strong> and creating nearshoring z<strong>on</strong>es to attract as muchbusiness as possible. Algeria, for its part, is placing its hopes <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> significantresources it has available, as well as a framework for internal development. In Libya,<strong>the</strong> government has adopted <strong>the</strong> model <strong>of</strong> using oil to generate growth, diversify <strong>the</strong>ec<strong>on</strong>omy and lower unemployment. Mauritania, for its part, relies <strong>on</strong> its four basicec<strong>on</strong>omic sectors: three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m traditi<strong>on</strong>al (mining, agriculture and fishing) and <strong>on</strong>emore recent (oil).All <strong>the</strong> countries are involved in a process <strong>of</strong> industrial development, with morediversity in Morocco and Tunisia and more focus <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> energy sector in Algeria.Numerous investment programmes and projects are under way in <strong>the</strong> three centralMaghreb countries. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y aim to improve linear infrastructure (roads and railways) inorder to develop a network <strong>of</strong> logistics hubs to c<strong>on</strong>centrate traffic, improve transportorganizati<strong>on</strong> and intermodality, and serve as a basis for logistics provisi<strong>on</strong>s meetingmodern standards. In Libya, an ambitious development programme <strong>of</strong> road and portinfrastructure and <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> hi<strong>the</strong>rto n<strong>on</strong>-existent rail infrastructure is under way.In Mauritania, infrastructure is also an important policy objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government,which is anxious to reinforce links with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Maghreb countries and create ac<strong>on</strong>vergence point between <strong>the</strong> north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinent and Sub-Saharan Africa.Proporti<strong>on</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> foreign general-cargo sector is larger in <strong>the</strong> Moroccan andTunisian ec<strong>on</strong>omies. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> increased requirements <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> chain in terms <strong>of</strong>20 CETMO
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Logistics</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Sector</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Shores</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Western</strong> Mediterranean October 2010services put pressure <strong>on</strong> improving <strong>the</strong> logistics sector. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Algeria andLibya, <strong>the</strong>re is a major imbalance in favour <strong>of</strong> energy-product exports. In Mauritania,ir<strong>on</strong>, copper, gold, oil and fish represent more than 97% <strong>of</strong> total exports.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> practically total predominance <strong>of</strong> traditi<strong>on</strong>al, local trade and <strong>the</strong> weakdevelopment <strong>of</strong> modern commercial distributi<strong>on</strong> is comm<strong>on</strong> to all five countriesstudied. Wholesalers c<strong>on</strong>trol imports and logistics <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sumer goods.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a noticeable, widespread effort to liberalize and improve <strong>the</strong> regulatoryc<strong>on</strong>text <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transport sector, and to define <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>s in logistics. However,procedures remain complex, particularly in Algeria. In additi<strong>on</strong>, a number <strong>of</strong> Ministershave input in <strong>the</strong> sector. Operators would like to see better coordinati<strong>on</strong>, with <strong>the</strong>Ministry <strong>of</strong> Transport taking c<strong>on</strong>trol. Str<strong>on</strong>ger c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enforcement <strong>of</strong> standardsis ano<strong>the</strong>r requirement comm<strong>on</strong> to all <strong>the</strong> Maghreb countries.In terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> players involved in <strong>the</strong> logistics sector, particularly public and privateoperators, <strong>the</strong> most typical features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current situati<strong>on</strong> are <strong>the</strong> following:<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> road transport sector is highly fragmented in all <strong>the</strong> countries and, moreimportantly, <strong>the</strong>re is no critical mass <strong>of</strong> structured companies. In Morocco and Algeria,<strong>the</strong>re are two public operators, although <strong>the</strong>y no l<strong>on</strong>ger have much market power.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> process <strong>of</strong> liberalizati<strong>on</strong> has not been accompanied by stricter c<strong>on</strong>trols <strong>on</strong>pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>alism or by strategies encouraging <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> structured companies.In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central Maghreb, rail transport is <strong>the</strong> m<strong>on</strong>opoly <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>alcompanies and <strong>the</strong>re are no private intermodal operators. In Libya, <strong>the</strong>re are no railservices yet and in Mauritania, <strong>the</strong> railway is used as an additi<strong>on</strong>al means <strong>of</strong> transportfor <strong>the</strong> State mining industry.Maritime transport is largely dominated by internati<strong>on</strong>al shipping companies presentthroughout <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean basin. In Tunisia and Algeria, <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al shippinglines (Compagnie Tunisienne de Navigati<strong>on</strong>, CTN and Compagnie Nati<strong>on</strong>aleAlgérienne de Navigati<strong>on</strong>, CNAN) still retain a significant share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market. This isalso <strong>the</strong> case in Libya, where <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al shipping line transports 80% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>country's oil.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> port sector is gaining importance in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> handling, thanks to <strong>the</strong> presence<strong>of</strong> several major internati<strong>on</strong>al players working al<strong>on</strong>gside nati<strong>on</strong>al companies and/or<strong>the</strong> port authorities, which still carry out this type <strong>of</strong> activity.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are still <strong>on</strong>ly a few nati<strong>on</strong>al logistics operators, as we understand <strong>the</strong>m inEurope. Few foreign companies are present.Lastly, in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> situati<strong>on</strong> regarding services, <strong>the</strong> most obvious comm<strong>on</strong> features are<strong>the</strong> following:<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> market share for road transport operated by self-employed individuals with <strong>the</strong>irown vehicle is still very high (greater than 40%) in all <strong>the</strong> central Maghreb countries.In Morocco and Algeria, un<strong>of</strong>ficial transport, which does not meet regulati<strong>on</strong>s, is verywidespread. Specializati<strong>on</strong>s such as refrigerated transport, <strong>the</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> hazardousgoods and freight c<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> have been developed very little and answer <strong>on</strong>ly tovery loose quality requirements. European operators c<strong>on</strong>trol internati<strong>on</strong>al freight. In<strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Libya and Mauritania, road transport operated by self-employedindividuals with <strong>the</strong>ir own vehicle is less extensive and barely reaches 20%, althoughin Mauritania <strong>the</strong>re is a crisis in <strong>the</strong> public transport market following liberalizati<strong>on</strong>.CETMO 21
- Page 1: The Logist
- Page 4 and 5: Study financed byEuropean Comission
- Page 6 and 7: October 2010The <s
- Page 8 and 9: October 2010The <s
- Page 10 and 11: October 2010The <s
- Page 12 and 13: October 2010The <s
- Page 14 and 15: October 2010The <s
- Page 16 and 17: October 2010The <s
- Page 18 and 19: October 2010The <s
- Page 20 and 21: October 2010The <s
- Page 22 and 23: October 2010The <s
- Page 24 and 25: October 2010The <s
- Page 26 and 27: October 2010The <s
- Page 30 and 31: October 2010The <s
- Page 32 and 33: October 2010The <s
- Page 34 and 35: October 2010The <s
- Page 36 and 37: October 2010The <s
- Page 38 and 39: October 2010The <s
- Page 40 and 41: October 2010The <s
- Page 42 and 43: October 2010The <s
- Page 44 and 45: October 2010The <s
- Page 46 and 47: October 2010The <s
- Page 48 and 49: October 2010The <s
- Page 50 and 51: October 2010The <s
- Page 52 and 53: October 2010The <s
- Page 54 and 55: October 2010The <s
- Page 56 and 57: October 2010The <s
- Page 58 and 59: October 2010The <s
- Page 60 and 61: October 2010The <s
- Page 62 and 63: October 2010The <s
- Page 64 and 65: October 2010The <s
- Page 66 and 67: October 2010The <s
- Page 68 and 69: October 2010The <s
- Page 70 and 71: October 2010The <s
- Page 72 and 73: October 2010The <s
- Page 74 and 75: October 2010The <s
- Page 76 and 77: October 2010The <s
- Page 78 and 79:
October 2010The <s
- Page 80 and 81:
October 2010The <s
- Page 82 and 83:
October 2010The <s
- Page 84 and 85:
October 2010The <s
- Page 86 and 87:
October 2010The <s
- Page 88 and 89:
October 2010The <s
- Page 90 and 91:
October 2010The <s
- Page 92 and 93:
October 2010The <s
- Page 94 and 95:
October 2010The <s
- Page 96 and 97:
October 2010The <s
- Page 98 and 99:
October 2010The <s
- Page 100 and 101:
October 2010The <s
- Page 102 and 103:
October 2010The <s
- Page 104 and 105:
October 2010The <s
- Page 106 and 107:
October 2010The <s
- Page 108 and 109:
October 2010The <s
- Page 110 and 111:
October 2010The <s
- Page 112 and 113:
October 2010The <s
- Page 114 and 115:
October 2010The <s
- Page 116 and 117:
October 2010The <s
- Page 118 and 119:
October 2010The <s
- Page 120 and 121:
October 2010The <s
- Page 122 and 123:
October 2010The <s
- Page 124 and 125:
October 2010The <s
- Page 126 and 127:
October 2010The <s
- Page 128 and 129:
October 2010maghrébineSynthèse<st
- Page 130 and 131:
October 2010The <s
- Page 132 and 133:
October 2010The <s
- Page 134 and 135:
October 2010The <s
- Page 136 and 137:
October 2010The <s
- Page 138 and 139:
October 2010The <s
- Page 140 and 141:
October 2010The <s
- Page 142 and 143:
October 2010The <s
- Page 144 and 145:
October 2010The <s
- Page 146 and 147:
October 2010The <s
- Page 148 and 149:
October 2010The <s
- Page 150 and 151:
October 2010The <s
- Page 152 and 153:
October 2010The <s
- Page 154 and 155:
October 2010The <s
- Page 156 and 157:
October 2010The <s
- Page 158 and 159:
October 2010The <s
- Page 160 and 161:
October 2010The <s
- Page 162 and 163:
October 2010The <s
- Page 164 and 165:
October 2010The <s
- Page 166 and 167:
October 2010The <s
- Page 168 and 169:
October 2010The <s
- Page 170 and 171:
October 2010The <s
- Page 172 and 173:
October 2010The <s
- Page 174 and 175:
October 2010Favourable FactorsReinf
- Page 176 and 177:
October 2010The <s
- Page 178 and 179:
October 2010The <s
- Page 180 and 181:
October 2010Essor des relationsavec
- Page 182 and 183:
October 2010The <s
- Page 184 and 185:
October 2010WeaknessesNo strategy f
- Page 186 and 187:
October 2010The <s
- Page 188 and 189:
October 2010The <s
- Page 190 and 191:
October 2010Accroissement durôle d
- Page 192 and 193:
October 2010The <s
- Page 194 and 195:
October 2010The <s
- Page 196 and 197:
October 2010The <s
- Page 198 and 199:
October 2010The <s
- Page 200 and 201:
October 2010The <s
- Page 202:
October 2010The <s