24.11.2014 Views

Industrija 2/2011 - Ekonomski institut

Industrija 2/2011 - Ekonomski institut

Industrija 2/2011 - Ekonomski institut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M . R a n k o v i ć , V. Va s k o v i ć Q u a n t i t a t i v e W e b s i t e A n a l y s i s : C a s e S t u d y o f . . .<br />

It is worthwhile mentioning that there are several limitations to this analysis.<br />

First, all data used in the research are collected on the basis of a limited number<br />

of accesses to each site in a specific time, despite the fact that the Web is a<br />

highly dynamic and changeable media. Similar studies in different periods of<br />

time may yield different results. Such evaluation will in time also shed some light<br />

on the fact whether there is a divergence or convergence of web activities. The<br />

second problem was the subjective nature of the factors' evaluation, which,<br />

although based on the results from the previous studies, introduces subjectivity<br />

into this analysis. Still, after the identification of the critical categories and factors<br />

within the WAI, the next phase would be testing these tools in different countries,<br />

and measuring the relation between the value index and the success of online<br />

banking. The evaluators may use this instrument with ease, without any specific<br />

training or knowledge, and, apart from this, the evaluation time is shorter than in<br />

other evaluation models. As further information on web design and usability<br />

become available, the evaluation index presented in this paper may be perfected<br />

into an empirically verified design tool.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Bauer, C. and Scharl, A. (2000): “Quantitative evaluation of web site<br />

content and structure”. Internet Research: Electronic Networking<br />

Applications and Policy, vol 10, nº 1, pp 31-43.<br />

2. Buenadicha, M, Chamorro, A., Miranda, F. J. y González, O. R. (2001):<br />

“A new Web Assessment Index: Spanish Universities analysis”. Internet<br />

Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol 11, nº 3.<br />

3. Evans, J. R. and King, V. E. (1999): “Business-to-business marketing<br />

and the World Wide Web: Planning, managing and assessing web<br />

sites”. Industrial Marketing Management, vol 28, pp. 343-358.<br />

4. Huizingh, E. (2000): “The content and design of web sites: an empirical<br />

study”. Information & Management, 37, pp. 123-134.<br />

5. Ho, J. (1997): “Evaluating the World Wide Web: A global study of<br />

commercial sites”. Journal of Computer MediatedCommunication, nº<br />

3, vol 1.<br />

6. Hoffman, D. L., T. P. Novak, and P. Chatterjee. (1995). "Commercial<br />

Scenarios for the Web: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of<br />

Computer-Mediated Communication 1(3).<br />

7. Liu, C., Arnett, K., Capella, L. and Beatty, R. (1997): “Web sites of the<br />

Fortune 500 Companies: Facing customers through home pages”.<br />

Information and Management, 31, pp. 335-345.<br />

8. Malak, G., Badri, L., Badri, M., Sahraoui, H. (2004): “Towards a<br />

Multidimensional Model for Web-Based Applications Quality<br />

Assessment“. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on E-<br />

Commerce and Web Technologies EC-Web 2004, Zaragoza, Spain, pp.<br />

316-327.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!