05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

interprets under the ordinary, promised guidance of the Holy Spirit, as a<br />

Word in itself absolutely perfect for its ends, giving law to reason, <strong>and</strong><br />

excluding tradition as any part, direct or indirect, of the Rule of Faith.<br />

2. It belongs to historical Lutheranism.<br />

II. <strong>The</strong> proposition we have just advanced, no Lutheran, in the<br />

historical sense of the word, can deny; for the man who would deny it,<br />

would, in virtue of that denial, prove that he is not in the historical sense<br />

Lutheran; for he, <strong>and</strong> he only, is such who believes that the doctrine of the<br />

gospel is rightly taught in the Augsburg Confession. We do not enter into<br />

the question, whether, in some sense, or in what sense, a man who denies<br />

this may be some kind of a Lutheran. We only affirm that he is not such in<br />

the historical sense of the word; that he is not what was meant by the name<br />

when it was first distinctively used--that is, not a Lutheran whom Luther, or<br />

the Lutheran Church for three centuries, would have recognized as such,<br />

nor such as the vast majority of the uncorrupted portions of our Church<br />

would now recognize.<br />

3. Commended by other communions.<br />

III. That many of the Articles of Faith set forth by our Church are<br />

pure <strong>and</strong> Scriptural, is acknowledged by all nominal Christendom; that an<br />

immense proportion of them is such, is confessed by all nominal<br />

Protestants. Zwingle declared that there were no men on earth whose<br />

fellowship he so desired as that of the Wittenbergers. Calvin subscribed<br />

the unaltered Augsburg Confession, <strong>and</strong> acted as a Lutheran minister<br />

under it. "Nor do I repudiate the Augsburg Confession (which I long ago<br />

willingly <strong>and</strong> gladly subscribed) as its author has interpreted it." So wrote<br />

Calvin, in 1557, to Schalling. Two mistakes are often made as to his<br />

meaning, in these much-quoted words. First: <strong>The</strong> Confession he<br />

subscribed was not the Variata. Calvin subscribed at Strasburg, in 1539.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Variata did not appear till 1540. Second: He does not mean nor say<br />

that he then subscribed it as its author had explained it. <strong>The</strong>re was no<br />

word of its author then, which even seemed in conflict with its original<br />

sense. Calvin means: Nor do I now repudiate it, as its author has<br />

interpreted it. <strong>The</strong> great Reformed divines have acknowledged that it has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!