05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

doctrine of Consubstantiation or of Impanation, <strong>and</strong> no one could impute<br />

it to them, unless he had failed to make himself properly acquainted with<br />

their views." To return again to theologians, REINHARD says: "Our<br />

Church has never taught that the emblems become one substance with the<br />

body <strong>and</strong> blood of Jesus, an opinion commonly denominated<br />

Consubstantiation." MOSHEIM says: "Those err who say that we<br />

believe in Impanation. Nor are those more correct who charge us with<br />

believing Subpanation. Equally groundless is the charge of<br />

Consubstantiation. All these opinions differ very far from the doctrine of<br />

our Church."<br />

<strong>The</strong> insinuations of Rationalism against this doctrine of our Church<br />

only strengthen the affirmations of her great divines. If all the great<br />

Congregational authorities of New Engl<strong>and</strong>, of the past century <strong>and</strong> the<br />

present, were quite agreed that a certain doctrine was not taught in the<br />

Saybrook Platform, <strong>and</strong> the "liberal" gentlemen of the <strong>The</strong>odore Parker<br />

school were very zealous in showing that it was taught there, would not<br />

Dr. Shedd consider the affirmation as sealing the negation? Would he not<br />

think that, if it were possible to make a mistake in believing the great<br />

divines, there could be no mistake possible in disbelieving the "liberal"<br />

polemics? We beg him therefore, as he desires to do, as he would be done<br />

by, not to think that our Lutheran Church, historically the mother of pure<br />

Churches, in some sense even of his own Church among them, has ever<br />

believed in the doctrine of Consubstantiation.<br />

Romanizing elements.<br />

One word more on the allegation of Dr. Shedd, that there are<br />

Romanizing elements in our Confession. Nothing is more easy, <strong>and</strong> few<br />

things are more perilous, than for Protestants to insist that some peculiarity<br />

of this, or that part of a denominational system of doctrine, is a relic of<br />

Romanism. Dr. Shedd makes this the solvent of our doctrine of the Lord's<br />

Supper, just as the Baptist makes it the solvent of Dr. Shedd's doctrine of<br />

infant baptism, <strong>and</strong> as the Socinian makes it the solvent of Dr. Shedd's<br />

doctrine of the Trinity, of the divinity of Christ, <strong>and</strong> of his propitiatory<br />

sacrifice. Not everything we learn from Rome is Romish. Not only so, but,<br />

as earnest Evangelical Protestants, we may admit, that deep <strong>and</strong> vital as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!