05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

presence mystify them? Dr. Shedd, perhaps wisely, has spared them this.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are, indeed, great departments of the history of doctrine on which he<br />

does not enter. He gives us, for example, nothing direct on the doctrines of<br />

the Church, of Baptism <strong>and</strong> of the Lord's Supper; yet these involve many<br />

of the most vital questions of the hour. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, he has gone, we<br />

think, beyond the bound, in devoting a whole book to the history of<br />

Apologetics, <strong>and</strong> another to an account of Symbols. He has done it so<br />

well, however, that we not only forgive him, but thank him for it.<br />

One very interesting feature of the book is its presentation of many of<br />

the Calvinistic doctrines in their coincidence with the Lutheran; as, for<br />

instance, in the paragraphs on the "Lutheran-Calvinistic <strong>The</strong>ory of<br />

Original Sin," "<strong>The</strong> Lutheran-Calvinistic <strong>The</strong>ory of Regeneration;" <strong>and</strong> on<br />

other points. Dr. Shedd seems to fear that "the chief criticism that may be<br />

made upon the work is, that it betokens subjective qualities unduly for an<br />

historical production." On the contrary, we think, that so far as is<br />

consistent with fidelity to conviction, his book is remarkably free from the<br />

offensive obtrusion of merely personal opinions. <strong>The</strong>re is not a page in it<br />

whose tone is unworthy of the refined c<strong>and</strong>or of a Christian gentleman.<br />

We are struck, indeed, as we have said, with what we regard as mistakes in<br />

reference to the Lutheran Church, but the statements of Dr. Shedd are<br />

made in a tone which relieves them of all asperity; <strong>and</strong> he knows so much<br />

more about our Church than most writers of English who have attempted<br />

to describe it, that we feel that his mistakes are involuntary. <strong>The</strong>y are fewer<br />

than might have been anticipated. Dr. Shedd speaks of the Augsburg<br />

Confession as "the symbol which was to consolidate the new evangelical<br />

Church into one external unity, in opposition to that of Rome." "But the<br />

doctrines of sin <strong>and</strong> redemption had been misstated by the Papal mind at<br />

Trent; <strong>and</strong> hence the principal part of the new <strong>and</strong> original work of the<br />

Lutheran divines was connected with these." This collocation might<br />

mislead the reader, who forgets that the Augsburg Confession was<br />

prepared fifteen years before the first convention of the Council of Trent.<br />

Dr. Shedd speaks of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!