05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

able to do with their imaginary arguments for her what they could not do<br />

with her real arguments for herself. <strong>The</strong>y have found that upsetting the men<br />

of straw, of their own making, was very different from uprooting the<br />

everlasting foundations of the temple reared by God. One of these weak<br />

inventions is, that our Church adopts this ungrammatical construction of a<br />

neuter pronoun with a masculine noun, <strong>and</strong> that hence she after all deserts<br />

the literal sense of the word, <strong>and</strong> that her interpretation really is: "This<br />

(bread) is not My body, but in, with, <strong>and</strong> under it My body is given." But<br />

as the Church does not consider the neuter pronoun as qualifying the<br />

masculine noun, <strong>and</strong> does not interpolate the word bread, but takes our<br />

Lord's words precisely as He utters them, all this ingenuity is thrown<br />

away. It only shows how she might have argued, had she possessed as<br />

little grammar, as little logic, <strong>and</strong> as little reverence for her Master's words<br />

as is exhibited by such antagonists. From the words: "This is My body,"<br />

she only gathers this: "This is Christ's body;" <strong>and</strong> neither on the one h<strong>and</strong><br />

that the bread is not His body, nor on the other that His body is given in,<br />

with, <strong>and</strong> under it. She acknowledges that the ecclesiastical (not Biblical)<br />

phrase “This bread is Christ's body," sets forth a truth, as the Church uses<br />

<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>s it; <strong>and</strong> from a comparison of text with text, she knows that<br />

the bread is the medium by which, in which, with which, under which the<br />

body is imparted, but she reaches this by no reading out of the text what is<br />

in it, nor reading into it, what is no part of it; but by interpreting every word<br />

in that natural <strong>and</strong> proper sense, which is fixed by the laws of language.<br />

Our Saviour says, Take, <strong>and</strong> we take; He says, Eat, <strong>and</strong> we eat; He says:<br />

This (which He has just told us to take, eat) is My body, <strong>and</strong> we believe it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> affirmation is as literal as the comm<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> we believe the one as we<br />

obey the other, to the letter, no more underst<strong>and</strong>ing His affirmation to be,<br />

This is not My body, than we underst<strong>and</strong> His comm<strong>and</strong> to be, Do not take,<br />

Do not eat.<br />

"My body," some have interpreted to mean “symbol of My body,"<br />

but as this would make the Saviour say that the "symbol

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!