05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Vitium in some of its forms is, as Nonius says, "perpetua et<br />

insanabilis atque irrevocabilis causa," "a cause which works always,<br />

beyond healing <strong>and</strong> beyond revoke."<br />

3, <strong>and</strong> last. Vitium is privative, yet the privation is productive of positive<br />

misery. Blindness is not a thing, but the want of a thing. When the first<br />

blindness took place, there was no creation of blindness, but the mere<br />

privation of that light which was given in the first creation: <strong>The</strong> absence of<br />

an arm is not a thing, but the defect of a thing; God did not create<br />

blindness or armlessness, nor does a man become a creator by making<br />

himself or his child armless or sightless. <strong>The</strong>se conditions are in themselves<br />

but negations, yet what positive ill results from these negations. <strong>The</strong><br />

ignorance of the blind, the helplessness of the maimed, result from these<br />

privative vitia. Though blindness be, per se, not something, but nothing,<br />

though the want of an arm be nothing, the deep grief is that where<br />

something should be there is nothing. <strong>The</strong> sophistry, therefore, that mere<br />

negation, mere defect, is inoperative, is exposed even by nature, for lack of<br />

operation is often the greatest of ills, <strong>and</strong> to say that because original sin is<br />

not substance or essence there can be no result from it, is in the last degree<br />

shallow <strong>and</strong> false. This point has been felicitously stated by Melanchthon:<br />

"It is useful to mark clearly the difference between the things created by<br />

God, <strong>and</strong> sin, which is the disturbance or confusion of the divine order:<br />

hence it is rightly said, Sin is a defect or privation...And here lies the<br />

answer to the sophistical question, Inasmuch as a defect is nothing, that is,<br />

is not a positive thing, how can God be angry at nothing? <strong>The</strong> answer is,<br />

there is a broad distinction between nothing privative <strong>and</strong> nothing<br />

negative. For nothing taken in the privative sense requires a subject, <strong>and</strong> is<br />

a certain destruction in that subject, on account of which that subject is<br />

rejected, as the ruins of an edifice are a destruction or scattering of parts in<br />

the mass. Thus Original Sin is a defilement <strong>and</strong> confusion of the parts of<br />

man, <strong>and</strong> God hates it, <strong>and</strong> on account of it is angered at the subject. In<br />

disease nothing has the sense of privation, inasmuch as the subject<br />

remains, <strong>and</strong> disease is a certain disturbance in the subject. <strong>The</strong> wounded<br />

man looks upon his wound sorrowfully, <strong>and</strong> knows

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!