05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the Lord's Supper. He states a number of important respects, in which he<br />

supposes the two Churches to agree touching Christ's sacramental<br />

presence. He then goes on to say: "But they differ as to the mode." <strong>The</strong><br />

inference here might seem to be natural that the Churches agree as to a<br />

fact, but not as to its philosophy, but this representation is inadequate, for<br />

the point of difference is as to the fact, <strong>and</strong>, indeed, in a very important<br />

sense, not at all as to the mode. Our controversy with Socinians is not as<br />

to the mode of the Trinity, for we confess that we cannot explain how the<br />

Trinal Unity exists, but it is as to the fact, whether there be a true Trinity in<br />

Unity, <strong>and</strong> not a mere idea] distinction. So in regard to the presence of<br />

Christ, our dispute is not as to how he is present, which, like the whole<br />

doctrine of His person, is an inscrutable mystery, but as to whether there<br />

be a true, not an ideal presence. It is the essence of the doctrine, not its<br />

form, which divides us from the Reformed. Let them satisfy us that they<br />

accept the fact, <strong>and</strong> we shall have no quarrel as to the philosophy of the<br />

mode, so far as the question of mode is separable from that of fact. Let us<br />

agree as to the kind of presence, its objective reality; let us agree that the<br />

true body <strong>and</strong> true blood of Christ are truly present, so that the bread is the<br />

communicating medium of the one, the cup of the other, <strong>and</strong> use these<br />

terms in one <strong>and</strong> the same sense, <strong>and</strong> we can well submit the mode of the<br />

mystery to the Omniscient, to whom alone mode is comprehensible.<br />

IV. <strong>The</strong> Lutheran Church teaches no Local Presence of Christ<br />

<strong>The</strong> next statement of Dr. Gerhart seems to us entirely a mistaken<br />

one. He says: "<strong>The</strong> Lutheran Church teaches no Local teaches that the<br />

veritable flesh <strong>and</strong> blood of Christ are locally present, being in, with, <strong>and</strong><br />

under the consecrated bread <strong>and</strong> wine." On the contrary, the Lutheran<br />

Church denies that there is a local presence of Christ's body <strong>and</strong> blood,<br />

<strong>and</strong> if such a presence be meant, she would deny that there is any presence<br />

of them "in, with, <strong>and</strong> under the consecrated elements." Between us <strong>and</strong><br />

the Reformed there never has been, there never can be, a controversy on so<br />

simple a point as this. <strong>The</strong> Lutheran Church maintains that there is a true<br />

presence of Christ's human nature, which is neither

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!