05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with Romanism at some points, there has been nursed a deeper <strong>and</strong> more<br />

radical anti-Romish feeling on these very doctrines, than his own?<br />

Dr. Shedd goes on to say: “<strong>The</strong>se Popish elements are found in<br />

those portions particularly, which treat of the sacraments; <strong>and</strong> more<br />

particularly in that article which defines the Sacrament of the Supper. In<br />

Article XIII, the Augsburg Confession is careful to condemn the Papal<br />

theory, that the sacraments are efficacious, ex opere operato, that is by<br />

their intrinsic efficacy, without regard to faith in the recipient, or to the<br />

operation of the Holy Spirit; but when, in Article X, it treats of the Lord's<br />

Supper, it teaches that 'the body <strong>and</strong> blood of Christ are truly present, <strong>and</strong><br />

are distributed to those who partake of the Supper.' This doctrine of<br />

Consubstantiation, according to which there are two factors, viz.: the<br />

material bread <strong>and</strong> wine, <strong>and</strong> the immaterial or spiritual body of Christ<br />

united or consubstantiated in the consecrated sacramental symbols, does<br />

not differ in kind from the Popish doctrine of Transubstantiation, according<br />

to which there is, indeed, but one element in the consecrated symbols, but<br />

that is the very body <strong>and</strong> blood of Christ into which the bread <strong>and</strong> wine<br />

have been transmuted." Nothing is more difficult, than for a thinker or<br />

believer of one school, fairly to represent the opinions <strong>and</strong> faith of thinkers<br />

<strong>and</strong> believers of another school. On the points on which Dr. Shedd here<br />

dwells, his Puritanical tone of mind renders it so difficult for him to enter<br />

into the very heart of the historical faith of the Church, that we can hardly<br />

blame him, that if it were his duty to attempt to present, in his own<br />

language, the views of the Lutheran Church, he has not done it very<br />

successfully. From the moment he ab<strong>and</strong>ons the Lutheran sense of terms,<br />

<strong>and</strong> reads into them a Puritan construction, from that moment he w<strong>and</strong>ers<br />

from the facts, <strong>and</strong> unconsciously misrepresents.<br />

In noticing Dr. Shedd's critique on this alleged feature of Romanism,<br />

we would say in passing, that the Augsburg Confession does not teach the<br />

doctrine of Consubstantiation. From first to last, the Lutheran Church has<br />

rejected the name of Consubstantiation <strong>and</strong> everything which that name<br />

properly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!