05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

speaks distinctly of that very flesh which was put to death upon the cross,<br />

<strong>and</strong> was raised in glory by the Father." Thirdly. <strong>The</strong> effects imputed to the<br />

Eucharist by Ignatius are entirely inconsistent with the supposition of its<br />

being a mere memorial or a mere spiritual communion. He imputes to it<br />

the power of producing the resurrection to eternal life; not that he denies<br />

that the wicked shall rise again, but that like St. Paul, when he speaks of<br />

attaining unto the resurrection of the dead, he means the resurrection in its<br />

true glory, as a rising to eternal life. <strong>The</strong> medicine of immortality, the<br />

antidote to death, the spring of life in Christ forever, can be no other than<br />

Christ's flesh itself--the organ of His whole work. KAHNIS. 411 "From<br />

these words it follows with certainty that Ignatius regarded the consecrated<br />

elements as the media of a Divine impartation of life, consequently as more<br />

than bare symbols;" <strong>and</strong> EBRARD 412 admits, "When he calls the<br />

Eucharist a medium of immortality, it is clear that he was thinking not of a<br />

bare, subjective memory of Christ, but of an actual appropriation of Christ<br />

<strong>and</strong> of all His graces." Fourthly. So far from the early Church, as<br />

represented in Ignatius, being indifferent to the doctrine held in regard to<br />

the Lord's Supper, we find that it is distinctly marked as a heresy,<br />

practically resulting in the eternal death of those who held it, that the<br />

Eucharist is not the flesh of our Saviour. Taking then the simple <strong>and</strong> direct<br />

interpretation of Ignatius, we find him in perfect affinity with the Tenth<br />

Article of the Augsburg Confession: 1st. In the assertion that the true body<br />

<strong>and</strong> blood of our Saviour--that which suffered <strong>and</strong> that which was raised-is<br />

present in the Eucharist, actually constituting it. 2d. That true bread <strong>and</strong><br />

true wine are present. 3d. That the bread <strong>and</strong> wine given <strong>and</strong> taken are the<br />

means by which the body <strong>and</strong> blood are imparted. When he says, That the<br />

cup is for the uniting ("enosis") of Christ's blood, the "enosis" points<br />

distinctly to that specific idea which Paul expresses when he says, <strong>The</strong> cup<br />

is the communion of Christ's blood, <strong>and</strong> which our Church expresses by<br />

saying that the blood is in, with, <strong>and</strong> under the cup. <strong>The</strong> word "enosis" is<br />

used by the Fathers to indicate the uniting of two things, <strong>and</strong> is most<br />

frequently used for the uniting<br />

411 Dogmat. II. 195.<br />

412 Abendm. I. 256.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!