05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

implies. Bold <strong>and</strong> uncompromising as our Confessors <strong>and</strong> <strong>The</strong>ologians<br />

have been, if the word Consubstantiation (which is not a more human term<br />

than Trinity <strong>and</strong> Original Sin are human terms,) had expressed correctly<br />

their doctrine, they would not have hesitated to use it. It is not used in any<br />

Confession of our Church, <strong>and</strong> we have never seen it used in any st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

dogmatician of our communion, except to condemn the term, <strong>and</strong> to<br />

repudiate the idea that our Church held the doctrine it involves. We might<br />

adduce many of the leading evidences on this point; but for the present, we<br />

will refer to but a few. Bucer, in his Letter to Com<strong>and</strong>er, confesses that "he<br />

had done injustice to Luther, in imputing to him the doctrine of<br />

Impanation," <strong>and</strong> became a defender of the doctrine he had once rejected.<br />

Gerhard, that monarch among our theologians, says: "To meet the<br />

calumnies of opponents, we would remark, that we neither believe in<br />

Impanation nor Consubstantiation, nor in any physical or local presence<br />

whatsoever. Nor do we believe in that consubstantiative presence which<br />

some define to be the inclusion of one substance in another. Far from us<br />

be that figment. <strong>The</strong> heavenly thing <strong>and</strong> the earthly thing, in the Holy<br />

Supper, in the physical <strong>and</strong> natural sense, are not present with one<br />

another." Baier, among our older divines, has written a dissertation<br />

expressly to refute this calumny, <strong>and</strong> to show, as Cotta expresses it, "that<br />

our theologians are entirely free from it (penitus abhorrere.)" Cotta, in his<br />

note on Gerhard, says: "<strong>The</strong> word Consubstantiation may be understood<br />

in different senses. Sometimes it denotes a local conjunction of two bodies,<br />

sometimes a commingling of them, as, for example, when it is alleged that<br />

the bread coalesces with the body, <strong>and</strong> the wine with the blood, into one<br />

substance. But in neither sense can that MONSTROUS DOCTRINE OF<br />

CONSUBSTANTIATION be attributed to our Church, since Lutherans<br />

do not believe either in that local conjunction of two bodies, nor in any<br />

commingling of bread <strong>and</strong> of Christ's body, of wine <strong>and</strong> of His blood." To<br />

pass from great theologians to a man of the highest eminence in the<br />

philosophical <strong>and</strong> scientific world, LEIBNITZ, in his Discourse on the<br />

Conformity of Reason with Faith, says: "Evangelical (Lutherans) do not<br />

approve of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!