05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ead of life which has come from heaven is the divine personality of Jesus<br />

Christ. To eat this bread can have no other meaning than to appropriate<br />

Jesus in faith. Now, as Jesus attaches to the eating of His flesh <strong>and</strong> the<br />

drinking of His blood the same operations which are attributed to faith (v.<br />

47) <strong>and</strong> to the eating of the bread of heaven (v. 50, 51), namely, eternal life,<br />

the eating of the flesh of Christ cannot be, specifically, anything else than<br />

the eating of the bread from heaven, that is, the faith which unites with<br />

Christ. <strong>The</strong> flesh of Christ, which He gives for the life of the world, is His<br />

body, which is to be given in death, that is, is His death. Eating the flesh<br />

<strong>and</strong> drinking the blood can, consequently, only mean the receiving in us,<br />

in faith, Jesus as the Crucified for us. This is the condition of salvation, of<br />

living fellowship with Christ, of everlasting life, of the resurrection. He who<br />

receives in himself Jesus Christ in His body <strong>and</strong> blood given to death,<br />

receives, in this bodily nature, slain for us, the life of Jesus Christ, which<br />

fills him with the powers of eternity. <strong>The</strong> unity of this proposition lies,<br />

beyond doubt, in this, that the power of the slain bodily nature of Christ is<br />

absorbed into the glorified bodily nature of Christ; so that he who grasps<br />

the sacrificed bodily nature of Christ with its propitiatory power, together<br />

with the glorified corporeal nature, is filled, by it, with the entire person of<br />

Christ. <strong>The</strong> discourse in John vi. does not, primarily, treat of the Supper,<br />

but of that faith which establishes a living fellowship between us <strong>and</strong><br />

Christ. But Christ, beyond doubt, designedly veiled the faith under the<br />

image of an eating of His flesh <strong>and</strong> drinking of His blood, in order to<br />

express the mystical thought which subsequently was to be transferred to<br />

the body in the Supper, just as in John iii. 5, He expressed the idea of<br />

Baptism. For the history of the exposition, see Abendm. 114 seq. It is now<br />

alone that we come to underst<strong>and</strong> why Jesus calls bread <strong>and</strong> wine not<br />

merely signs of His death, but of His body <strong>and</strong> blood, which are to be<br />

given to death. Inasmuch as Christ designates His death as a suffering<br />

which is to be endured by His body, His blood, He means to express the<br />

thought that just as little as broken bread ceases to be bread, <strong>and</strong> wine<br />

poured out ceases to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!