05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of God are without repentance," that is, there is no vacillation, repentance,<br />

or fluctuation of mind in God. But when to these absolute words is added:<br />

"Do this in remembrance of me," there comes in something dependent<br />

upon man's will, <strong>and</strong> which may, therefore, fluctuate. As it is true, even of<br />

the man that perishes, that Christ's body was broken <strong>and</strong> His blood shed<br />

for him, “for our Lord Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, tasted death for<br />

every man;" as it is true that every man in the Resurrection shall be called<br />

forth from the grave, for "as in Adam all die, so in Christ shall all be made<br />

alive," though some shall rise to glory, <strong>and</strong> others to shame; so is it true<br />

that every man, however unworthy, sacramentally partakes of the body <strong>and</strong><br />

blood of Christ in the Supper, though it be to his own condemnation. As<br />

the unbelieving, under the Old Dispensation, were, equally with the<br />

believing, outwardly sprinkled with the blood of the covenant, though they<br />

received not, for lack of faith, its blessings; as those who are unbelieving<br />

<strong>and</strong> baptized receive the baptism itself in its sacramental entireness, though<br />

they do not appropriate its blessings, so do the communicants in the Holy<br />

Supper confirm the testimony, that, although unbelief shuts us out from the<br />

blessings of the promises <strong>and</strong> ordinances, we cannot thereby make them<br />

of none effect. Our faith does not make, <strong>and</strong> our unbelief cannot unmake<br />

them. <strong>The</strong> same objective reality is in every case presented, <strong>and</strong> in every<br />

case it is one <strong>and</strong> the same thing, whose benefits faith appropriates, <strong>and</strong><br />

unbelief rejects.<br />

That Judas was at the Supper of the Lord seems highly probable.<br />

Matthew <strong>and</strong> Mark, after telling us that our Lord "sat down with the<br />

twelve," describe the Institution of the Supper without giving a hint of the<br />

departure of Judas. Luke, who proposed to write "in order," <strong>and</strong> who is<br />

generally regarded as most precise in his chronology, in direct connection<br />

with the words of the Supper, immediately after them, tells us our Lord<br />

said: "But, behold! the h<strong>and</strong> of him that betrayeth Me is with Me on the<br />

table." (Luke xxii. 21.) <strong>The</strong> force of the word "immediately," in John xiii.<br />

30, is not such as to exclude the possibility of what Luke seems so<br />

distinctly to assert, <strong>and</strong> what the two other synoptical evangelists more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!