05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

has not redeemed us by His blood, nor is the cup of the Eucharist the<br />

communication of His blood, nor the bread which we break the<br />

communication of His body; for blood is not save of veins <strong>and</strong> flesh, <strong>and</strong> of<br />

the rest of human substance, in which the Word of God was truly made."<br />

"How say they that the flesh passeth to corruption, <strong>and</strong> partaketh not<br />

of life, the flesh which is nourished from the body of the Lord <strong>and</strong> His<br />

blood. Either let them (i.e. heretics) change their mind or abstain from<br />

offering the things above spoken of (that is, the Eucharist). Our doctrine<br />

harmonizes with the Eucharist, <strong>and</strong> the Eucharist confirms our doctrine,<br />

<strong>and</strong> we offer to God His own, carefully teaching the communication <strong>and</strong><br />

union of the flesh <strong>and</strong> spirit, <strong>and</strong> confessing the resurrection.' For as the<br />

earthly bread (literally, the bread from the earth,) (apo gees artos),<br />

receiving the invocation of God, is no longer common bread, but<br />

Eucharist, consisting of two things, an earthly <strong>and</strong> a heavenly, so also our<br />

bodies, receiving the Eucharist, are no longer corruptible, having the hope<br />

of the resurrection to eternal life."<br />

Here we see distinctly, First, the doctrine of the copresence, really<br />

<strong>and</strong> truly, of the two elements,--the earthly one, true bread; the heavenly<br />

one, true body; the earthly one, the true cup; the heavenly one, the true<br />

blood. Second. We see that the earthly is regarded as the communicating<br />

medium of the heavenly, <strong>and</strong> a supernatural efficacy, reaching both body<br />

<strong>and</strong> soul, is connected with them. We see, moreover, that the consecration<br />

(the ekkleesis or epikleesis) of God produces the union of the earthly <strong>and</strong><br />

heavenly. <strong>The</strong> doctrine of Irenaeus alike is opposed to the Romish denial<br />

of the bread <strong>and</strong> the Reformed denial of the body.<br />

Very violent is the pretext of Doellinger <strong>and</strong> Möhler, who make the<br />

earthly part the body <strong>and</strong> blood of Christ, <strong>and</strong> the heavenly part, the<br />

Logos; but the passage says nothing about the Logos, nor would the<br />

Fathers call the Logos a pragma, a thing or part of the Eucharist. <strong>The</strong><br />

"epigeion" (earthly) manifestly refers to the "apo gees," (just before,) the<br />

earth, from which the bread is said to come, <strong>and</strong> with reference to which it<br />

is called “earthly."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!