05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ut that "this wine is like the New Testament in Christ's blood, or the<br />

pouring out of this wine like the pouring out of the New Testament--or of<br />

the blood which is its constituting cause." <strong>The</strong> interpretation, therefore, of<br />

the word “cup," which they grant to be a correct one, if legitimately<br />

accepted,. overthrows their doctrine.<br />

But this still leaves untouched the point of the alleged inconsistency<br />

between the principles on which our Church interprets the "first" <strong>and</strong><br />

"second" parts of the formula of the Lord's Supper. But our Church does<br />

not believe, as the alleged inconsistency would involve, that there is a<br />

rhetorical figure in the words, "This is my blood," or, “This cup is the<br />

New Testament in my blood." If, in a case fairly parallel, we acknowledge<br />

in the second part of the formula what we denied in the first, then, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

only, could we be charged with inconsistency. But in this case there is no<br />

parallel whatever, nor even the semblance of inconsistency. We do not<br />

interpret any word of the "second" part of the formula metaphorically, <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore cannot be inconsistent with our denial of a metaphor in the<br />

"first." We do not interpret the word "cup" to mean "sign," "symbol," or<br />

"figure" of cup; but because a literal cup actually contains <strong>and</strong> conveys its<br />

literal contents, so that you cannot receive the contents without receiving<br />

the cup, nor the cup, without receiving the contents; they are so identified,<br />

that, without dreaming of a departure from the prose of everyday life, all<br />

the cultivated languages of men give the name “cup" both to the thing<br />

containing <strong>and</strong> the thing contained. <strong>The</strong>re is, however, this difference--that<br />

the thing designed to contain bears the name "cup" even when empty, but<br />

the thing contained bears the name "cup" only in its relations as contained.<br />

A wine-cup may hold no wine; a cup of wine involves both wine as<br />

contained, <strong>and</strong> a cup as containing. <strong>The</strong> word "cup" may mean, without<br />

metaphor: First. <strong>The</strong> vessel meant to contain liquids, whether they be in it<br />

or not. Second. <strong>The</strong> liquid which is contained in such a vessel, or is<br />

imparted by it. Third. <strong>The</strong> vessel <strong>and</strong> liquid together. Before the<br />

sacramental cup was filled, the word "cup" would be applied to it in the<br />

first sense. In the words: "He took the cup," Luke

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!