05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

But rationalism itself cannot, without doing violence to the acknowledged<br />

ordinary laws of language, read into the words of the Supper a<br />

metaphorical sense. H<strong>and</strong>le these words of our Lord as boldly, construe<br />

them from as low a level as those of ordinary men, still no metaphor can be<br />

found in them. This assertion we hope to prove by a careful investigation of<br />

the fundamental principles of metaphor, which we shall reduce to thetical<br />

statements, <strong>and</strong> endeavor to illustrate. We shall try to present the rhetoric<br />

of the metaphor in the relation it bears to its logic.<br />

I. Grammatical <strong>and</strong> Rhetorical Figures.<br />

I. <strong>The</strong> metaphor belongs, according to a distinction made by some<br />

writers, to the rhetorical figure, as distinguished from the grammatical<br />

figure. <strong>The</strong> distinguishing difference between the rhetorical figure <strong>and</strong> the<br />

grammatical is that the rhetorical is based upon an ideal relation, the<br />

grammatical upon a real one, or what is believed to be such. To say, He<br />

keeps a good table, this purse is gold, this cup is coffee, this bottle is wine,<br />

is to use a grammatical figure; for the relation of the subject to the<br />

predicate is that of real conveyance. <strong>The</strong>re is a real purse <strong>and</strong> real gold, a<br />

real cup <strong>and</strong> real coffee, a real bottle <strong>and</strong> real wine; <strong>and</strong> the figure turns<br />

simply upon the identification of the thing conveying with the thing<br />

conveyed, both being real, <strong>and</strong> the thing conveyed being communicated in<br />

some real respect by means of the thing conveying.<br />

Again, we say of particular books of the Bible: This book is Isaiah,<br />

this book is John. This is a grammatical figure, for the relation of<br />

authorship is real on which the identification rests. <strong>The</strong>re is a real book,<br />

written by a real Isaiah, a real John, <strong>and</strong> hence we give the name of the<br />

author to his work. So we say: Here is my Milton, take down that<br />

Shakspeare, my Burke is in twelve volumes, I have read Homer through;<br />

or of pictures: This is a Raphael, this is a Salvator Rosa, this is a copy from<br />

Titian, this is a Canova. Is your Madonna a Murillo or a Michael Angelo?<br />

All these are grammatical figures, for they imply a real relation between<br />

the author or painter who produces <strong>and</strong> the book, or work of art, produced.<br />

Again, we say: His pen is able, his pencil is artistic; meaning

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!