05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

evangelical system grounds itself, where alone a just system in regard to<br />

human restoration can be grounded; for the first question, when disease is<br />

to be cured, is, What is that disease? Is it so trifling as to need no<br />

physician"? Can a man heal it himself? Will it heal itself simply by the<br />

general energy of the system? or is it radical true disease, mortal in its<br />

tendency? Does it require for its treatment a physician of the highest order,<br />

<strong>and</strong> remedies of the most exquisite adaptation <strong>and</strong> potency? To all of<br />

these questions, with characteristic simplicity <strong>and</strong> practical force, our great<br />

Confession replies, when it says: "Original sin is truly sin."<br />

If it be asked, in what sense did our confessors use the word sin? we<br />

reply, in what we have seen <strong>and</strong> shown to be its scriptural sense. Is it<br />

asked what did they, <strong>and</strong> what do we, regard as its scriptural sense? we<br />

reply, the language of the Confession tells us most explicitly what they<br />

meant by true sin, <strong>and</strong> by that Confession in firm faith we abide. Yet it<br />

may not be useless to give, as a further illustration of its meaning, the<br />

definition of sin by Melanchthon, not only because of his relation to the<br />

Confession as its composer, but yet more because in his purest <strong>and</strong><br />

happiest period, his definitions were as sound in their substance as they<br />

were discriminating <strong>and</strong> felicitous in their form. It may be doubted<br />

whether, before Melanchthon, in his Loci of 1535, any successful attempt<br />

had been made to define sin generically. <strong>The</strong> definitions of the fathers are<br />

either of specific sin, original or actual, or are too vague for the purposes of<br />

science. Pelagius tried to show, from some of Augustine's definitions of<br />

sin, that original sin is not really sin. What Augustine had said of sins of<br />

act, Pelagius applied to sin of nature. Melanchthon, in his Loci of the<br />

Second Era, 257 (1535-1541), says: "Sin in Holy Scripture does not merely<br />

mean something done (factum aliquod), but it signifies also a perpetuated<br />

fault (perpetuum vitium), that is a corruption of nature conflicting with the<br />

law of God. Sin therefore, generically taken, is a perpetuated fault, or act,<br />

conflicting with the law of God. Sin is divided into original <strong>and</strong> actual." In<br />

the Loci of the Third Era (1543-1559), he says that in Scripture the<br />

257 Corpus Reformatorum. xxi. 284, 378. In German: Do. xxii. 159.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!