05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the Apostles', Nicene, <strong>and</strong> Athanasian Creeds, <strong>and</strong> added a confession<br />

on manifold points, held, indeed, potentially <strong>and</strong> implicitly in the faith of<br />

the pure Church, but never before formally confessed by her.<br />

But, furthermore, the Augsburg Confession, even as a Lutheran<br />

document, is an abiding witness of the right <strong>and</strong> duty of Christian men, <strong>and</strong><br />

a portion of the Christian Church to amplify the confession of the faith,<br />

according to the leadings of God's providence. For the Augsburg<br />

Confession is really not first, but fourth in the Genesis of our Church's first<br />

official statement of her distinctive faith. For first were the XV Marburg<br />

Articles, in which the great representatives of our Church made a statement<br />

of points of faith; then the XVII Articles of Swabach, then the Articles of<br />

Torgau, <strong>and</strong> as the outgrowth of the whole, <strong>and</strong> their noble consummation,<br />

last of all, the Augsburg Confession.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Augsburg Confession, itself, grew from its earliest shape, at the<br />

beginning of the Conference at Augsburg, up to the day of its delivery to<br />

the Emperor. <strong>The</strong> one faith which it confessed in its infant form, shaped its<br />

phrases, added to its enumerations, guarded against misapprehensions<br />

more perfectly, until it reached its maturity.<br />

III. <strong>The</strong> right to "change a creed," "by addition," is, if it be fallacy at<br />

all, not a common fallacy, with the assumption of a right to “change by<br />

subtraction." <strong>The</strong> mistake here involved is in using the word "change"<br />

ambiguously, <strong>and</strong> to in making it falsely emphatic. We deny the right of a<br />

pure Church to change the faith: we hold that her creed should not be<br />

changed; but we maintain, first, that to cut out articles of faith bodily from<br />

her creed, <strong>and</strong> to mangle <strong>and</strong> change the meaning of what remains, is to<br />

change her creed; <strong>and</strong> secondly, that to leave her earlier creed untouched<br />

<strong>and</strong> unvaried, to cling to it heart <strong>and</strong> soul, in its original <strong>and</strong> proper sense,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in order to the maintenance of the faith it treasures, to witness again, in<br />

ampler form, by adding clear <strong>and</strong> Scriptural statements of doctrine, is not<br />

to change the creed, but is the act of wisdom to prevent its change. If a<br />

clergyman, on one Lord's Day, should succinctly set forth the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!