05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fishes to His disciples for the multitude (Matt. xiv. 19; xv. 36). 6. He had<br />

said, "Take, eat," <strong>and</strong> had assigned as the reason why this solemn<br />

preparation had taken place, <strong>and</strong> this comm<strong>and</strong> was now given: "This is<br />

My body." If "this" means "this bread," it means not that bread which was<br />

before the six acts, but this bread, which is eaten after the six acts; <strong>and</strong> if it<br />

be called the body of Christ now, it is not because it is a symbol of the<br />

body, for this it was then, but because it is now what St. Paul expressly<br />

calls it, "the communion," or medium of the communication of Christ's<br />

body. Conceived in this way the word bread would mean the complex<br />

result of the sacramental union, the sacramental bread in its supernatural<br />

conjunction with the sacramental body. This bread, this complex, is not<br />

symbol but reality. It is literally Christ's true body, as it is literally true<br />

bread. As the words, "This man is God," applied to Christ, means, This<br />

man is literally God personally, (in virtue of the personal union), yet is<br />

literally man naturally, Christ is true man <strong>and</strong> true God; so the words, This<br />

bread is Christ's body, mean, This bread is literally Christ's body<br />

sacramentally, (in virtue of the sacramental union,) yet is literally bread<br />

naturally. <strong>The</strong> Eucharist is true bread <strong>and</strong> true body. Before the miraculous<br />

blessing of the five loaves <strong>and</strong> the fishes it was true, That food is not food<br />

for thous<strong>and</strong>s; after the blessing, it was true, This food is food for<br />

thous<strong>and</strong>s: before the blessing that bread was not the body of Christ; after<br />

the blessing, This bread is His body.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ancient Church.<br />

Hence the Ancient Church <strong>and</strong> the Lutheran Church, holding the<br />

same faith, have not hesitated at all to use the expression, "This bread, or<br />

the sacramental bread, is Christ's body," while both would repudiate as<br />

error the idea that bread, as bread, can be called Christ's body. <strong>The</strong> fathers<br />

are very explicit in affirming that it is not bread, as bread, of which they<br />

affirm that it is Christ's body, but that bread whose character is<br />

conditioned by the six sacramental acts of our Lord. Thus Jerome 386 : "<strong>The</strong><br />

bread which our Lord brake <strong>and</strong> gave to His disciples is His body."<br />

Gaudentius 387 : "When our Lord reached the consecrated bread <strong>and</strong> wine<br />

to His disciples,<br />

386 Epist. ad Hedebiam.<br />

387 In Exod. Tract 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!