05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IS TO SAY, of the Spirit." It is contended that it is parallel to such an<br />

expression as this: "God <strong>and</strong> our Father," which means: "God, that is to<br />

say, our Father." In the epexegesis, one thing is spoken of in more than<br />

one aspect, <strong>and</strong>, hence, under more than one term. For instance, in the<br />

phrase we have quoted: "God <strong>and</strong> our Father" means: That Being who is<br />

God, as to his nature, <strong>and</strong> Father, as to his relation to us, God essentially,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Father relatively; in a word, both God <strong>and</strong> Father. It does not make<br />

the term God metaphorical, <strong>and</strong> the term Father the literal substitute for it.<br />

If an epexegesis, therefore, were supposable in John iii. 5, the phrase could<br />

only mean: Born of that which is water, as to its outer part, <strong>and</strong> Spirit, as to<br />

its internal agent, that is, both water <strong>and</strong> Spirit. It is, therefore, of no avail to<br />

resort to the epexegesis here, even if it were allowable. But it is not<br />

allowable. <strong>The</strong>re is not an instance, so far as we know, in human language,<br />

in which a noun used metaphorically is conjoined by a simple "<strong>and</strong>" with<br />

a term which is literal <strong>and</strong> is meant to explain it. In a word, the resorts of a<br />

false interpretation, which are sometimes very specious, utterly fail in this<br />

case. Our Lord has fixed the sense of his words so surely, that the<br />

unprejudiced who weigh them calmly cannot be at a loss as to their<br />

meaning.<br />

Is Baptism necessary to salvation?<br />

<strong>The</strong> Augsburg Confession (Art. IX. 1) declares that Baptism "is<br />

necessary to salvation." Is it justified in so doing? Can we accept a<br />

statement apparently so sweeping? Is it a Scripture statement?<br />

In order properly to answer these questions, it is necessary to<br />

determine what the Confessors meant. In all human writings, <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

Book of God, occur propositions apparently universal, which are,<br />

nevertheless, in the mind of the writer, limited in various ways. What is the<br />

meaning of the proposition of our Confession? Is it absolute, <strong>and</strong> without<br />

exceptions, <strong>and</strong> if it meant to allow exceptions, what are they? <strong>The</strong> first<br />

question we naturally ask, in settling the meaning of our Confession, is,<br />

What is Baptism?<br />

1. What is Baptism?<br />

<strong>The</strong> Platform, in, defining what Baptism it supposes the Church to<br />

connect with salvation, designates it as "such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!