05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eternity, the God of omnipotence, the God of the unity in trinity, has a<br />

human nature, forming one person with His own, may be, we are bound to<br />

accept it, if His word teaches it; <strong>and</strong> we have seen that His word does teach<br />

it.<br />

Onus prob<strong>and</strong>i.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has been great disingenuousness among some of the opposers<br />

of the Scripture doctrine of the Lord's Supper. <strong>The</strong>y have first urged the<br />

speculative difficulties of natural reason against the direct sense of the text;<br />

then professing to be willing to bow before the Word of God with absolute<br />

submission, they yet claim to have shown, on the ground of natural reason,<br />

that the Word does not teach the doctrine for which we here contend. Now<br />

the true mode of Scripture interpretation is: First. To fix the direct <strong>and</strong><br />

literal sense of the words by the laws of language. Second. To adhere to<br />

that sense, unless, under a law acknowledged by God's Word itself, we are<br />

bound to accept a figurative sense. Those who depart from the literal sense<br />

in a disputed case are always by that fact thrown upon the defensive. He<br />

who has the literal sense of the text with him, is under no obligation to<br />

argue for his doctrine until it shall be shown that the literal sense is not<br />

tenable. On the main point of the objective presence, proven by taking the<br />

words in the literal sense, the immense majority of Christendom has been<br />

<strong>and</strong> is a unity. Those who deny the doctrine are bound to show that the<br />

literal sense cannot (not simply may not) be the true one. To say the literal<br />

sense cannot be the true one, because a small minority in the Christian<br />

Church think that sense involves something in conflict with their reason, is<br />

not only rationalistic, but egotistic <strong>and</strong> conceited in the last degree. Those<br />

who accept the literal sense have quite as much natural reason, quite as<br />

much power of seeing the difficulties it suggests, as the rationalizing<br />

minority. <strong>The</strong> question can never be settled on that ground. <strong>The</strong> attempt to<br />

do it has only wrought division. It has made chaos where Christendom<br />

before had order. <strong>The</strong> Reason, which has rejected the literal sense, has<br />

never been able to fix another. It has dropped pearl after pearl of truth into<br />

its vinegar, <strong>and</strong> the total result is spoiled vinegar <strong>and</strong> ruined pearls. <strong>The</strong><br />

Reason has been injured by the abuse of the truth, <strong>and</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!