05.04.2013 Views

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology - Saint Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sake, in its untouched sin, would pass into heaven still unregenerate. <strong>The</strong><br />

theory errs utterly either by excess or by lack. If a child has not a sinful<br />

nature, it needs no Saviour. If its sin is not a proper subject of<br />

condemnation, it needs no forgiveness. But if it has a sinful nature, it needs<br />

not only a Saviour from penalty, but a renewing power to save it from the<br />

indwelling of sin; if it is subject to condemnation, it not only needs<br />

forgiveness, but the exercise of a gracious power which will ultimately<br />

remove what is condemnable. In other words, it needs to be born again.<br />

9. Nothing but downright Pelagianism of the extremest kind can save<br />

any man logically from the conclusion we are urging. Original sin must be<br />

counteracted in its natural tendency to death, first, by a power which<br />

removes its penalty, <strong>and</strong> secondly, by a power which ultimately removes<br />

the sin itself. <strong>The</strong> power which removes the penalty is in our Lord Jesus<br />

Christ, who made atonement for original sin, as well as for the actual sins<br />

of men; the power which can remove the sin itself is in the new birth. <strong>The</strong><br />

former, to use the old theological terminology, is necessary to remove the<br />

reatus of original sin, that is, its present guilt <strong>and</strong> immediate liability; the<br />

latter is necessary to remove its fomes, the inciting fomenting power itself,<br />

or, as it is sometimes called, the materiale, or essence of sin, which would,<br />

left to itself, ever renew the guilt <strong>and</strong> its curse. It is as impossible to<br />

separate the justification of an infant from its regeneration, as it would be to<br />

justify an adult while his heart is unchanged. <strong>The</strong>se two things, justification<br />

<strong>and</strong> regeneration, may be separated mentally, <strong>and</strong> are really distinct, but<br />

they are never separated in fact. Unless there be regeneration, there will be<br />

no forgiveness. A regenerated man is always justified, a justified man is<br />

always regenerated; <strong>and</strong> unless a man be both, he is neither. A justified<br />

infant, unregenerate, is inconceivable in the kingdom of God; such<br />

justification would belong to the kingdom of darkness. Alike then to the<br />

attainment of both forgiveness <strong>and</strong> sanctification, or of either, there is a<br />

necessity which is most absolute; no human being has been, or can be,<br />

saved from eternal death unless he be born again.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!